Descriptor
| Peer Acceptance | 2 |
| Popularity | 2 |
| Social Status | 2 |
| Academically Gifted | 1 |
| Age Differences | 1 |
| Females | 1 |
| Gifted | 1 |
| Intermediate Grades | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Males | 1 |
| Peer Evaluation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Roeper Review | 2 |
Author
| Luftig, Richard L. | 1 |
| Martray, Carl R. | 1 |
| Nichols, Marci L. | 1 |
| Norman, Antony D. | 1 |
| Ramsay, Shula G. | 1 |
| Roberts, Julia L. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedNorman, Antony D.; Ramsay, Shula G.; Roberts, Julia L.; Martray, Carl R. – Roeper Review, 2000
This study compared the social status of highly gifted (N=42) and moderately gifted (N=86) secondary students across academic and social settings. Giftedness was not significantly related to social status in either setting. Two social statuses, popular and rejected, were significantly stable across settings and were related to peer nominations for…
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Age Differences, Peer Acceptance, Peer Relationship
Peer reviewedLuftig, Richard L.; Nichols, Marci L. – Roeper Review, 1991
This study, with 64 gifted students (grades 4-8) and 432 nongifted peers, found that, although gifted boys were the most popular group, gifted girls were the least popular. Gifted boys were perceived by peers to be physically attractive, less aggressive, more creative, and smarter than other children. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Females, Gifted, Intermediate Grades, Junior High Schools
