Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Deafness | 2 |
| Hearing (Physiology) | 2 |
| Language Processing | 2 |
| Semantics | 2 |
| Adults | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Figurative Language | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Novelty (Stimulus Dimension) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Segal, Osnat | 2 |
| Ben-hur, Galia | 1 |
| Gold, Rinat | 1 |
| Peleg, Orna | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Israel | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkPeleg, Orna; Ben-hur, Galia; Segal, Osnat – Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2020
Purpose: Studies on reading in individuals with severe-to-profound hearing loss (deaf) raise the possibility that, due to deficient phonological coding, deaf individuals may rely more on orthographic-semantic links than on orthographic-phonological links. However, the relative contribution of phonological and semantic information to visual word…
Descriptors: Word Recognition, Visual Discrimination, Deafness, Adults
Gold, Rinat; Segal, Osnat – Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2017
In the present study, we compared the processing of both conventional and novel metaphors by deaf versus hearing young adults. Eighteen deaf participants with severe-to-profound hearing loss and 18 controls matched for age, sex, and years of education were presented with word pairs of 4 types (literal, conventional metaphors, novel metaphors, and…
Descriptors: Figurative Language, Language Processing, Comparative Analysis, Deafness
