NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Education Level
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of…1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 16 to 30 of 50 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Journal of Law and Education, 1996
The Supreme Court, in "Vernonia School District 47J versus Acton," ruled that a school district's policy authorizing random urinalysis drug testing of student-athletes did not violate the Fourth Amendment. Discusses the decision and why such a policy is permissible under the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable searches…
Descriptors: Athletes, Court Litigation, Drug Use Testing, Extramural Athletics
Chapman, David W.; And Others – 1986
Public secondary school administrators should deduce from the 1985 "New Jersey v. T.L.O." Supreme Court decision that searching students does not violate the Constitutional prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures when there are reasonable grounds for suspicion. The "Wallace v. Jaffree" case, decided in the same…
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Administrators, Court Litigation, Federal Courts
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ehrensal, Patricia A. – Journal for a Just and Caring Education, 1996
In examining student searches from a critical theory perspective, one considers who is being searched, who does the searching and by what authority, and how searching reinforces existing power structures. This article addresses these questions and related concepts (discipline, criminal/deviant behavior, punishment, and rehabilitation) by applying…
Descriptors: Compulsory Education, Court Litigation, Critical Theory, Legal Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Williams, Charles F. – Insights on Law & Society, 2001
Focuses on two U.S. Supreme Court cases involving unreasonable searches and seizures: (1) Kyllo v. United States, No. 99-8508; and (2) Indianapolis v. Edmond, No. 99-1030. Includes information about the first case and the basis and decision of the second case. (CMK)
Descriptors: Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Drug Legislation, Government Role
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Update on Law-Related Education, 1989
"Honest Mistakes and the Exclusionary Rule" (D. Morris; J. Sullivan) outlines an activity designed to capture students' interest in drug search and seizure issues. "Drug Testing: Is It Constitutional?" (C. Hankins) presents a lesson which addresses these same issues by focusing discussion and role playing upon the…
Descriptors: Class Activities, Constitutional Law, Instructional Materials, Law Related Education
Splitt, David A. – Executive Educator, 1985
Washington's State Supreme Court held unconstitutional a secondary school's routine search of the luggage of all students participating in a school-sponsored overnight trip. Such general searches are not permitted, and schools can find other means of ensuring good student discipline. (PGD)
Descriptors: Civil Liberties, Court Litigation, Field Trips, Privacy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Trosch, Louis A.; And Others – Journal of Law and Education, 1982
Argues that school administrators encounter conflicts with the Fourth Amendment when they conduct searches of high school students. Discusses the reluctance of the courts to hold school officials to Fourth Amendment standards; why the Fourth Amendment should apply nonetheless; and an analytical model of how school searches can be accomplished.…
Descriptors: Compliance (Legal), Court Litigation, Discipline Policy, Due Process
Hickok, Angelia B. – Tennessee Education, 1980
Although problems of drug abuse, bomb threats, theft, and concealed weapons sometimes make search and seizure necessary, the student's rights must be protected through proper legal procedures. The article presents guidelines for conducting locker and personal searches and for educating students, teachers, and administrators on student rights. (DS)
Descriptors: Civil Liberties, Discipline Policy, Due Process, School Law
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Phillips, James – Update on Law-Related Education, 1989
Examines the role of the friend of the court, ("amicus curiae"), by discussing the filing of a brief in a drug testing case currently under consideration by the U.S. Supreme Court. Explores the issue of drug testing for employment; suggests possible outcomes; and provides 10 discussion questions for use with students. (KO)
Descriptors: Civil Liberties, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Employment Qualifications
Splitt, David A. – Executive Educator, 1985
Outlines the confusion surrounding a Supreme Court decision in the "New Jersey vs. TLO" case, which put at issue the prohibition against unreasonable searches in schools. The Court's decision allows a lower standard of reasonableness to be applied in school searches. The standards are not clear and are open to serious question. (MD)
Descriptors: Compliance (Legal), Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Drug Use
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gross, Norman – Update on Law-Related Education, 1978
Questions whether school officials are justified by the Fourth Amendment in searching students and/or student lockers in public schools. Various case studies are discussed as examples to consider in deciding about responsibilities, powers, and limitations of school officials, and in determining student rights. Journal availability see: SO 507 249.…
Descriptors: Civil Rights, Court Role, Educational Environment, Legal Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lewis, Wendy Bay; Williams, Charles F. – Insights on Law & Society, 2001
Focuses on the U.S. Bill of Rights Fourth Amendment discussing what it means related to current technological advances, such as automobiles and computers. Provides information on court cases relevant to the Fourth Amendment, such as Atwater v. City of Lago Vista and City of Indianapolis v. Edmond. Lists ideas for learning activities. (CMK)
Descriptors: Civics, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Educational Strategies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Repa, Barbara Kate; Daly, Joseph L. – Social Education, 1985
In New Jersey v. T.L.O., a case argued in 1984, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether incriminating evidence found by a school assistant princial during the search of a student's purse can be used in a criminal trial. Issues, facts, background, and arguments of the case are provided. (RM)
Descriptors: Civics, Civil Rights, Court Litigation, Instructional Materials
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stader, David L. – Clearing House, 2002
Notes that students' legitimate expectations of privacy and school officials' need to maintain school discipline and safety often collide. Outlines guidelines for searching in the following instances: student lockers; drug dogs; student trips; strip searches; and urinalysis. Suggests that training for all administrators, faculty, and staff in the…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Discipline Policy, Drug Use Testing, Management Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Williams, Charles F.; Leiterman, Hannah – Social Education, 1999
Provides summaries of U.S. Supreme Court case decisions during its 1998-99 term on the following issues: (1) sexual harassment; (2) street gangs; (3) search and seizure; (4) welfare; (5) immigration; and (6) census. Previews the 1999-2000 term. Includes the article "Teaching Activities and Discussion Questions" by Hannah Leiterman. (CMK)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Educational Strategies, Fees, Immigration
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4