Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Confidence Testing | 19 |
Scoring | 19 |
Multiple Choice Tests | 14 |
Guessing (Tests) | 10 |
Test Reliability | 9 |
Scoring Formulas | 8 |
Testing | 8 |
Test Validity | 6 |
Item Analysis | 5 |
Response Style (Tests) | 5 |
Testing Problems | 4 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Bruno, James E. | 3 |
Rippey, Robert M. | 3 |
Anderson, Richard Ivan | 1 |
Boldt, Robert F. | 1 |
Brennan, Robert L. | 1 |
Brunza, J. Jay | 1 |
Donato, Joy | 1 |
Echternacht, Gary J. | 1 |
Fenna, Doug S. | 1 |
Gibbons, Jean D. | 1 |
Novacek, Paul | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Reports - Research | 6 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - General | 1 |
Education Level
Adult Education | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Practitioners | 1 |
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Novacek, Paul – International Association for Development of the Information Society, 2013
Traditional knowledge assessments rely on multiple-choice type questions that only report a right or wrong answer. The reliance within the education system on this technique infers that a student who provides a correct answer purely through guesswork possesses knowledge equivalent to a student who actually knows the correct answer. A more complete…
Descriptors: Adult Learning, Multiple Choice Tests, Guessing (Tests), Confidence Testing

Gibbons, Jean D.; And Others – Psychometrika, 1979
On a multiple-choice test in which each item has k alternative responses, the test taker is permitted to choose any subset which he believes contains the one correct answer. A scoring system is devised. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Confidence Testing, Efficiency, Multiple Choice Tests, Scoring

Wisner, Joel D.; Wisner, Robert J. – Business Education Forum, 1997
Undergraduate business students completed two multiple-choice tests: one in which they indicated their answer and one of three levels of confidence, and one in which they circled the item only when they possessed high confidence in the answer. The three-level test took longer to take and grade; students preferred the second format. Both types…
Descriptors: Business Education, Confidence Testing, Higher Education, Multiple Choice Tests
Anderson, Richard Ivan – Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 1982
Describes confidence testing methods (confidence weighting, probabilistic marking, multiple alternative selection) as alternative to computer-based, multiple choice tests and explains potential benefits (increased reliability, improved examinee evaluation of alternatives, extended diagnostic information and remediation prescriptions, happier…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Confidence Testing, Multiple Choice Tests, Probability

Rippey, Robert M.; Donato, Joy – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1978
Confidence scored tests allow subjects to respond to the options on a multiple choice test by assigning probabilities to each of the item options. This paper describes an interactive FORTRAN computer program used for administering, scoring, and interpreting the results of confidence scored tests. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Confidence Testing, Measurement Techniques, Multiple Choice Tests
Boldt, Robert F. – 1974
One formulation of confidence scoring requires the examinee to indicate as a number his personal probability of the correctness of each alternative in a multiple-choice test. For this formulation a linear transformation of the logarithm of the correct response is maximized if the examinee accurately reports his personal probability. To equate…
Descriptors: Confidence Testing, Guessing (Tests), Multiple Choice Tests, Probability

Poizner, Sharon B.; And Others – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1978
Binary, probability, and ordinal scoring procedures for multiple-choice items were examined. In two situations, it was found that both the probability and ordinal scoring systems were more reliable than the binary scoring method. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Confidence Testing, Guessing (Tests), Higher Education, Multiple Choice Tests
Suhadolnik, Debra; Weiss, David J. – 1983
The present study was an attempt to alleviate some of the difficulties inherent in multiple-choice items by having examinees respond to multiple-choice items in a probabilistic manner. Using this format, examinees are able to respond to each alternative and to provide indications of any partial knowledge they may possess concerning the item. The…
Descriptors: Confidence Testing, Multiple Choice Tests, Probability, Response Style (Tests)
Rippey, Robert M. – 1974
The effects of incentive conditions on the results of a confidence test were investigated. Two hundred thirty high school subjects were administered a very difficult confidence scored test under two conditions: 1) that the test would count heavily on their grades (incentive condition) and 2) that the test was for research purposes and would not be…
Descriptors: Confidence Testing, Guessing (Tests), High School Students, Motivation
Fenna, Doug S. – European Journal of Engineering Education, 2004
Multiple-choice testing (MCT) has several advantages which are becoming more relevant in the current financial climate. In particular, they can be machine marked. As an objective testing method it is particularly relevant to engineering and other factual courses, but MCTs are not widely used in engineering because students can benefit from…
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Testing, Multiple Choice Tests, Engineering Education

Pugh, Richard C.; Brunza, J. Jay – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1975
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Confidence Testing, Multiple Choice Tests, Personality
Stegman, Charles E. – 1973
Probabilistic testing involves having the examinee assign probabilities to each of the options of a multiple-choice item. These probabilities reflect the student's perception of the correctness of each option. What is presented in the paper is a rationale for probability testing, the current theoretical and empirical findings, and some suggested…
Descriptors: Annotated Bibliographies, Confidence Testing, Guessing (Tests), Measurement Techniques

Bruno, James E. – Computers in the Schools, 1987
Discussion of how computer technology can be integrated into elementary school instruction focuses on evaluating student learning through test scoring. Highlights include descriptions of a computer-based instructional delivery system, modified confidence weighted admissible probability measurement (MCW-APM), and computer-managed instructional…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Managed Instruction, Confidence Testing
Echternacht, Gary J.; And Others – 1971
This handbook presents instructions for implementing a confidence testing program in technical training situations, identification of possible areas of application, techniques for evaluating confidence information, advantages and disadvantages of confidence testing, time considerations, and problem areas. Complete instructions for "Pick-One" and…
Descriptors: Confidence Testing, Educational Diagnosis, Guessing (Tests), Measurement Techniques

Bruno, James E. – Journal of Research and Development in Education, 1989
This study examined multiple choice testing for formative and summative evaluation among sixth-grade inner-city students (N=568) who were assessed simultaneously, with forced choice and information based (confidence weighted) test scoring formats. Results are discussed, with emphasis on implications for teacher evaluation of low-achieving…
Descriptors: Confidence Testing, Forced Choice Technique, Formative Evaluation, Grade 6
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2