Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| English (Second Language) | 2 |
| Scoring | 2 |
| Second Language Learning | 2 |
| Syntax | 2 |
| Writing Tests | 2 |
| Artificial Intelligence | 1 |
| Automation | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Discourse Analysis | 1 |
| Essays | 1 |
| Factor Structure | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Baba, Kyoko | 1 |
| Cumming, Alister | 1 |
| Eouanzoui, Keanre | 1 |
| Erdosy, Usman | 1 |
| Han, Turgay | 1 |
| James, Mark | 1 |
| Kantor, Robert | 1 |
| Sari, Elif | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Canada | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Test of English as a Foreign… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkSari, Elif; Han, Turgay – Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 2021
Providing both effective feedback applications and reliable assessment practices are two central issues in ESL/EFL writing instruction contexts. Giving individual feedback is very difficult in crowded classes as it requires a great amount of time and effort for instructors. Moreover, instructors likely employ inconsistent assessment procedures,…
Descriptors: Automation, Writing Evaluation, Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing
Download full textCumming, Alister; Kantor, Robert; Baba, Kyoko; Eouanzoui, Keanre; Erdosy, Usman; James, Mark – ETS Research Report Series, 2006
We assessed whether and how the discourse written for prototype integrated tasks (involving writing in response to print or audio source texts) field tested for the new TOEFL® differs from the discourse written for independent essays (i.e., the TOEFL essay). We selected 216 compositions written for 6 tasks by 36 examinees in a field…
Descriptors: Discourse Analysis, Essays, Scores, Language Proficiency
