NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Prewitt, Kenneth, Ed.; Schwandt, Thomas A., Ed.; Straf, Miron L., Ed. – National Academies Press, 2012
"Using Science as Evidence in Public Policy" encourages scientists to think differently about the use of scientific evidence in policy making. This report investigates why scientific evidence is important to policy making and argues that an extensive body of research on knowledge utilization has not led to any widely accepted explanation…
Descriptors: Public Policy, Policy Formation, Scientists, Evidence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Braxton, John M.; Bayer, Alan E. – Journal of Higher Education, 1994
A survey of 334 biochemists identified 5 patterns of attitudes and beliefs about taking action for scientific misconduct: (1) reputational harm, (2) sanction criteria, (3) whistleblower stigmatization, (4) professional etiquette, and (5) ideological desensitization. Influences of intraprofessional status, departmental cohesion, institutional…
Descriptors: Attitudes, Beliefs, Biochemistry, Fraud
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Palmer, David D.; And Others – Social Studies of Science, 1988
Examines the patterns of contracts between academic marine scientists and two kinds of federal funding agencies. Discusses the quality of working relationships, quality of academic marine scientific work, and dilemma of conflicting value systems. Finds that the scientists rate science-oriented agencies more favorably than society-oriented ones.…
Descriptors: Attitudes, Federal Programs, Oceanography, Public Agencies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fox, Mary Frank; Braxton, John M. – Journal of Higher Education, 1994
A discussion of misconduct in scientific research looks at the roles of several segments of the scientific community (federal government, universities, scholarly journals, and individual scientists) in exercising control of misconduct. Limitations of their roles and overall implications for policy are examined. (MSE)
Descriptors: Administrative Policy, Federal Regulation, Fraud, Government Role
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Zurer, Pamela – Chemical and Engineering News, 1989
Discusses the drive to raise science and engineering education's funding in the NSF budget from 9 percent to 20 percent. Notes that the target is $600 million per year. (MVL)
Descriptors: College Science, Educational Needs, Elementary School Science, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lafollette, Marcel C. – Journal of Higher Education, 1994
In the U.S. Congress, attention to scientific fraud and misconduct has involved extensive use of oversight authority. Because scientists and universities have failed to respond promptly to calls for self-regulation, Congress has imposed formal regulations and favors increased scrutiny of research and a reassessment of university-government-science…
Descriptors: College Role, Federal Government, Federal Regulation, Fraud
St. John, Mark; Helms, Jenifer V.; Castori, Pam; Hirabayashi, Judy; Lopez, Laurie; Phillips, Michelle – Inverness Research, 2009
The documents enclosed in this report provide a comprehensive and systematic review of the progress made in developing a network organization capable of supporting nanoscience education for the public on a national scale. There is a logic to the studies that were done and to the reports that are included in this notebook. The following are the…
Descriptors: Workshops, Leadership, Administrators, Scientists