New Mexico legislator proposes a tuition tax credit plan for individual taxpayers. (MK)

The author argues that State assumption of a greater percentage of educational costs and more consistent property assessment would make the property tax a more equitable and acceptable method of raising school revenue. (JG)

Criticizes plans for public support of church related schools. (MK)

From the Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Education Commission of the States (3rd, Denver, Colorado, July 7-9, 1969).

Discusses the implications for state funding of education behind the recent California case, Serrano vs Priest. (JF)

While revenue sharing is a unique and masterful windfall to local districts over the nation, if proposed cuts in current education programs are made and a special education revenue sharing bill not funded, the Wisconsin State Department of Public Instruction will be unable to guarantee the State's fundamental interest in education. (Author/JN)

Discusses possible future trends in educational finance following the California court decision in Serrano vs Priest. (JF)

Discusses Minnesota's recent tax reform legislation which provides for increased state financing of education. (JF)

A member of the President's Commission on School Finance presents an interpretation of that Committee's report. (JF)

In effect, a portion of each American's individual income tax payments will be returned to his own State and locality by revenue sharing. (Author/JN)

There is always an inherent danger that public education may come to the point of extreme federal dependency as a result of revenue sharing. For this reason States must find another way of solving their basic, longrange problems of education financing independent of the federal bureaucracy. (Author/JN)

Property taxes for the cost of educational programs should be virtually eliminated. (Author/JN)