Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Court Litigation | 2 |
| Federal Courts | 2 |
| School Desegregation | 2 |
| Boards of Education | 1 |
| Conflict | 1 |
| Counties | 1 |
| Educational Policy | 1 |
| Equal Protection | 1 |
| Federal Legislation | 1 |
| Government Role | 1 |
| Interviews | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Educational Policy | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Georgia | 2 |
| Florida | 1 |
| Georgia (Atlanta) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkDeBray-Pelot, Elizabeth H. – Educational Policy, 2007
The present article, a cross-case analysis, analyzes one aspect of the implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) that has generated conflict between the U.S. Department of Education and the federal court system. The conflicts arose between the courts' oversight of desegregation and the implementation of the public school choice…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Politics of Education, Boards of Education, Transfer Policy
LEFLAR, ROBERT A.
PRESENTED WERE ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS THAT AROSE WHEN THE SUPREME COURT MADE THE DECISION ON THE INTEGRATION OF SCHOOLS. THE DECISION APPLIED TO ALL STATE-SUPPORTED EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS. THE AUTHORITY OF STATE LAWS WAS QUESTIONED, BUT NO STATE LAW REQUIRING OR PERMITTING SEGREGATION IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS WAS NOW VALID. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Equal Protection, Federal Courts, Government Role
