Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Author
| Dolmans, D. | 1 |
| Harm J. A. Biemans | 1 |
| Morteza Karami | 1 |
| Nafiseh Taghizadeh Kerman | 1 |
| Omid Noroozi | 1 |
| Roebertsen, H. | 1 |
| Savelberg, H. | 1 |
| Schillings, Marlies | 1 |
| Seyyed Kazem Banihashem | 1 |
| Whittingham, J. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
| Netherlands | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkNafiseh Taghizadeh Kerman; Omid Noroozi; Seyyed Kazem Banihashem; Morteza Karami; Harm J. A. Biemans – Interactive Learning Environments, 2024
In peer feedback literature, little is known about the patterns of success for peer feedback activities in online learning environments. This study aims to explore the peer feedback patterns of successful, less successful, and unsuccessful higher education students for argumentative essay writing. In this exploratory study, 330 higher education…
Descriptors: Electronic Learning, Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Success
Schillings, Marlies; Roebertsen, H.; Savelberg, H.; Whittingham, J.; Dolmans, D. – Educational Studies, 2020
Academic writing is a complex competence in higher education. To develop this competence, teachers' written feedback is vital, especially if it contains feed-up, feed-back and feed-forward information. However, academic writing does not always improve after provision of written feedback. The purpose of this study was to explore if peer-to-peer…
Descriptors: Peer Relationship, Teacher Student Relationship, Feedback (Response), Dialogs (Language)
