Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Source
| Grantee Submission | 2 |
Author
| Correnti, Richard | 1 |
| Diane Litman | 1 |
| Elaine Lin Wang | 1 |
| Haoran Zhang | 1 |
| Howe, Emily | 1 |
| Lindsay Clare Matsumura | 1 |
| Litman, Diane | 1 |
| Magooda, Ahmed | 1 |
| Matsumura, Lindsay Clare | 1 |
| Quintana, Rafael | 1 |
| Richard Correnti | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| Grade 5 | 2 |
| Grade 6 | 2 |
| Intermediate Grades | 2 |
| Middle Schools | 2 |
Audience
Location
| Louisiana | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full text
Direct linkRichard Correnti; Lindsay Clare Matsumura; Elaine Lin Wang; Diane Litman; Haoran Zhang – Grantee Submission, 2022
Recent reviews of automated writing evaluation systems indicate lack of uniformity in the purpose, design, and assessment of such systems. Our work lies at the nexus of critical themes arising from these reviews. We describe our work on eRevise, an automated writing evaluation system focused on elementary students' text-based evidence-use. eRevise…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Automation, Elementary School Students
Wang, Elaine Lin; Matsumura, Lindsay Clare; Correnti, Richard; Litman, Diane; Zhang, Haoran; Howe, Emily; Magooda, Ahmed; Quintana, Rafael – Grantee Submission, 2020
We investigate students' implementation of the feedback messages they received in an automated writing evaluation system ("eRevise") that aims to improve students' use of text evidence in their writing. Seven 5th and 6th-grade teachers implemented "eRevise" (n = 143 students). Qualitative analysis of students' essays across…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Writing Evaluation, Computer Software, Grade 5
