NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Source
Evidence & Policy: A Journal…76
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 76 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Haselswerdt, Jake; Rigby, Elizabeth – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2021
Background: Policy advocates play a key role linking the separate worlds of research and policymaking - often serving as research brokers who increase the use of research and promoting more informed decision making. Yet this group is often overlooked in studies of research utilisation. Methods: We undertook two surveys of state-level advocates in…
Descriptors: Policy, Research, Advocacy, Research Utilization
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jones, Kirsty; Bice, Sara – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2022
Background: The gap between research and practical implementation remains a major challenge for policymakers. Research co-creation, involving researchers co-designing and co-producing research with industry, government and civil society, can support improved end user uptake and better research implementation. Aims and objectives: This Practice…
Descriptors: Knowledge Management, Research, Program Implementation, Policy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Elizabeth Day; Karen Bogenschneider – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2024
Background: Understanding how policymakers define research and differentiate it from other sources of data is critical for scientists to improve how they conduct and communicate research to policy audiences. Yet, few studies have explicitly asked policymakers -- particularly state legislators in the USA -- how they define research evidence.…
Descriptors: Policy Formation, Legislators, State Legislation, Scientific Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jonas Videbaek Jørgensen – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2024
Background: Understanding knowledge utilisation in policymaking is a core task for the social and political sciences. However, limitations and biases abound in commonplace approaches to measuring such use. Consequently, we have little systematic evidence of the extent to which knowledge sources are used in policy decisions. Aims and objectives:…
Descriptors: Research Utilization, Policy Formation, Measurement, Content Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Page, Amy P.; Olubiyi, Oluwatoyin B.; Wong, Yin-Ling Irene; Kang-Yi, Christina D. – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2022
Background: Although public-academic partnerships (PAPs) to improve the health and well-being of vulnerable populations have proliferated in public care for youth, existing literature lacks information about whether PAPs lead to public care agency leaders' use of research evidence and promote youth mental health and well-being. Aims and…
Descriptors: Research Utilization, Youth, Mental Health, Well Being
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Long, Elizabeth C.; Smith, Rebecca L.; Scott, J. Taylor; Gay, Brittany; Giray, Cagla; Storace, Rachel; Guillot-Wright, Shannon; Crowley, D. Max – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2021
Background: There is growing interest in and recognition of the need to use scientific evidence to inform policymaking. However, many of the existing studies on the use of research evidence (URE) have been largely qualitative, and the majority of existing quantitative measures are underdeveloped or were tested in regional or context-dependent…
Descriptors: Scientific Research, Research Utilization, Government Employees, Federal Legislation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bozzini, Emanuela – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2021
Background: The evidence base for the regulatory assessment of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDC) has proved very controversial to define. The EU has been a first mover and--after years of discussions and conflicts--adopted criteria for the pesticide and biocide sectors in 2018. Key points: The article reviews alternative regulatory options and…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Hazardous Materials, Poisoning, Guidelines
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Karen Gray; Lisa Dibsdall; Linda Sumpter; Ailsa Cameron; Paul Willis; Jon Symonds; Matthew Jones; Hugh McLeod; Geraldine Macdonald; Christie Cabral – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2024
Background: Despite calls for greater use of research and an appetite to do so within adult social care, a gap persists between research and practice. Aims and objectives: To explore views of adult social care staff about research and its application to everyday practice. To understand how these might impact upon research use capacity-building…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Caregivers, Caregiver Attitudes, Adults
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gleeson, Joanne; Rickinson, Mark; Walsh, Lucas; Cutler, Blake; Salisbury, Mandy; Hall, Genevieve; Khong, Hang – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2023
Background: This article comes in response to two gaps within the research use literature: a lack of work on quality of use as distinct from quality of evidence, and a lack of research use models based on practitioner, as opposed to researcher, perspectives. Aims and objectives: The study probes into the views of education practitioners about…
Descriptors: Research Utilization, Educational Research, Evidence Based Practice, Teachers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Norton, Theresa C.; Rodriguez, Daniela C.; Howell, Catherine; Reynolds, Charlene; Willems, Sara – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2021
Background: Little is known about how knowledge brokers (KBs) operate in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to translate evidence for health policy and practice. These intermediaries facilitate relationships between evidence producers and users to address public health issues. Aims and objectives: To increase understanding, a mixed-methods…
Descriptors: Developing Nations, Foreign Countries, Research Utilization, Public Health
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ziam, Saliha; Gignac, Pierre; Courant, Élodie; Mc Sween-Cadieux, Esther – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2021
Background: Decisions related to the development and implementation of public health programmes or policies can benefit from more effective use of the best available knowledge. However, decision makers do not always feel sufficiently equipped or may lack the capacity to use evidence. This can lead them to overlook or set aside research results…
Descriptors: Public Health, Health Programs, Research Utilization, Evidence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hawe, Penelope; Conte, Kathleen P.; Groen, Sisse; Loblay, Victoria; Green, Amanda; Innes-Hughes, Christine; Milat, Andrew; Persson, Lina; Mitchell, Jo; Thackway, Sarah; Williams, Mandy – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2021
Background: A number of ways to conduct research are designed to maximise the likelihood that evidence from research is quickly transferred into practice. This includes action research and partnership research between researchers and policy makers. Such approaches focus research effort on questions of highest relevance to practice and policy so as…
Descriptors: Research Utilization, Cooperation, Researchers, Policy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yanovitzky, Itzhak; Weber, Matthew – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2020
A broad range of methodologies is routinely employed to track and analyse use of research evidence in public policymaking. However, available methods and tools are mostly equipped to track 'evidence' but are less equipped to capture and represent 'use' of evidence. In particular, existing methods overlook policymakers' frequent use of evidence for…
Descriptors: Evidence, Public Policy, Policy Formation, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hollands, Fiona M.; Pan, Yilin; Kieffer, Michael J.; Holmes, Venita R.; Wang, Yixin; Escueta, Maya; Head, Laura; Muroga, Atsuko – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2022
Background: Education decision makers are increasingly expected to use evidence to inform their actions. However, the majority of educational interventions have not yet been studied and it is challenging to produce high quality research evidence quickly enough to influence policy questions. Aims and objectives: We set out to gather evidence on the…
Descriptors: Elementary Schools, Urban Schools, Reading Instruction, Instructional Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Neely, Kate; Bortz, Martin; Bice, Sara – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2021
This article provides an appraisal of collaborative conceptual modelling (CCM) as a tool for research translation. First developed by Newell and Proust (2012), CCM draws on the tools and frameworks of systems thinking as a way of addressing transdisciplinary problems. We applied CCM in two separate workshops - one discussing 'Digital Cities', and…
Descriptors: Cooperation, Interdisciplinary Approach, Research Utilization, Research and Development
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6