NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Phipps, David; Jensen, Krista E.; Johnny, Michael; Poetz, Anneliese – Journal of Research Administration, 2016
Each application to the National Science Foundation (NSF) must contain a Broader Impact (BI) strategy. Similarly, grant applications for most research funders in Canada and the UK require strategies to support the translation of research into impacts on society; however, the guidance provided to researchers is too general to inform the specific…
Descriptors: Grants, Grantsmanship, Foreign Countries, Knowledge Management
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Corvo, Kenneth; Zlotnik, Joan; Chen, Wan-Yi – Research on Social Work Practice, 2008
This study examines the organizational and institutional factors that may be associated with the success of schools of social work (SOSWs) in securing research grant awards from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and constituent agencies. Using data from the CRISP database on NIH grant funding, the Lombardi Program on Measuring University…
Descriptors: Awards, Grants, Social Work, Public Agencies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Heathington, Betty S.; Teague, Gerald V. – Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 1980
A survey of rejected applicants for federal grants revealed that while most of them secured feedback from agencies regarding the disapproval, many were concerned about the value of such information. Follow-up and program modifications can result only when effective interaction is achieved. (MLW)
Descriptors: Evaluation, Federal Aid, Feedback, Financial Aid Applicants
Gunn, Thomas – Coll Univ Bus, 1970
Descriptors: Coordinators, Federal Aid, Federal Programs, Financial Support
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wood, Fiona Q.; And Others – Higher Education, 1992
A survey investigated the Australian federal research grant process from the perspectives of unsuccessful 1991 applicants (n=222) from four universities. Findings include a number of limitations in the peer review process and information dissemination by the funding agency and raise questions about external evaluator selection. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Federal Aid, Foreign Countries, Grantsmanship, Higher Education
Atnip, Gilbert W. – 1984
Sources of research funds for undergraduate faculty and ways to secure the funds are discussed. Information on three federal grant programs is provided, along with advice for obtaining funds from foundations and corporations, including techniques for gathering information on prospective funding sources. Suggestions on the process of preparing…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Eligibility, Federal Aid, Federal Programs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Emery, Judy A.; And Others – SRA Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 1992
A study investigated the factor(s) predicting success in receiving National Institutes of Health (NIH) First Independent Research Support and Transition (FIRST) funding. Two analytical models were used with a variety of researcher, methodology, project design, and institutional characteristics as variables. No significant predictor variables were…
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Federal Aid, Federal Programs, Financial Support
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Danielson, Louis C.; And Others – Remedial and Special Education (RASE), 1993
This article describes the federal grant funding process for initial special education career researchers, including discussions of research priority development, the application review process, review criteria, characteristics of projects funded in recent competitions, and recommendations to improve researchers' ability to write competitive…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Educational Research, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria