Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Mathematics | 3 |
Research Methodology | 3 |
Scientific Research | 3 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Physics | 2 |
Biology | 1 |
Blended Learning | 1 |
Chemistry | 1 |
Data Collection | 1 |
Educational Research | 1 |
Engineering Education | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Cepeda, Francisco Javier… | 1 |
Coessens, Kathleen | 1 |
François, Karen | 1 |
Hagstrom, Warren O. | 1 |
Hargens, Lowell L. | 1 |
Van Bendegem, Jean Paul | 1 |
Vinckier, Nigel | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
François, Karen; Coessens, Kathleen; Vinckier, Nigel; Van Bendegem, Jean Paul – Journal of Philosophy of Education, 2020
This paper investigates the impact of publication pressure on the ethics and the scientific integrity in the domain of mathematics and of the arts. Both research fields are specific in their methodology, being that they do not start from a classical hypothesis and researchers in these areas are not knowing what the outcome will be. The research…
Descriptors: Stress Variables, Writing for Publication, Ethics, Integrity
Cepeda, Francisco Javier Delgado – International Association for Development of the Information Society, 2017
This work presents a proposed model in blended learning for a numerical methods course evolved from traditional teaching into a research lab in scientific visualization. The blended learning approach sets a differentiated and flexible scheme based on a mobile setup and face to face sessions centered on a net of research challenges. Model is…
Descriptors: Blended Learning, Models, Methods Courses, Teaching Methods

Hargens, Lowell L.; Hagstrom, Warren O. – Sociology of Education, 1982
Data from probability samples of U.S. graduate faculty in physics, chemistry, biology, mathematics, and political science are examined to determine whether variation in disciplinary consensus on research priorities and techniques is associated with differences in status-attainment patterns. Results support the hypothesis. (Author/AM)
Descriptors: Biology, Chemistry, Educational Research, Faculty Promotion