NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Paola Ruiz-Bernardo; Auxiliadora Sales; Aida Sanahuja Ribés; Odet Moliner – Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 2024
From an understanding of knowledge mobilisation as a set of strategies that favour responsible and inclusive research, the aim of this paper is to identify the obstacles or barriers to carrying out such research in higher education institutions, as perceived by researchers. In this descriptive study, content analysis is used to examine…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Barriers, Researchers, Knowledge Management
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Pastor-Sanz, Laura; Fogelholm, Michael; Feskens, Edith; Westerterp-Plantenga, Margriet; Schlicht, Wolfgang; Brand-Miller, Jennie; Raben, Anne – Journal of Research Administration, 2021
A multi-centre clinical trial involves the implementation of the same clinical protocol at several independent investigational centres. Multi-centre clinical trials may be preferable to single-centre trials, but their implementation and management is more complex. EU-funded collaborative projects involve several participating organizations and…
Descriptors: Research Administration, Medical Research, Institutional Cooperation, Administrative Organization
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Senabre Hidalgo, Enric – Journal of Research Practice, 2018
Agile methods, initially used by cross-functional teams in software development projects, can also facilitate teamwork in collaborative research projects. For this, project management-related issues need to be addressed, including the challenge of finding practical means for coordinating scientific collaboration, while garnering commitment from…
Descriptors: Research Administration, Interdisciplinary Approach, Research Projects, Case Studies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Molas-Gallart, Jordi – American Journal of Evaluation, 2012
Through a comparative study of the United Kingdom and Spain, this article addresses the effect of different research governance structures on the functioning and uses of research evaluation. It distinguishes three main evaluation uses: distributive, improvement, and controlling. Research evaluation in the United Kingdom plays important…
Descriptors: Governance, Foreign Countries, Comparative Analysis, Research Administration
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ion, Georgeta; Duran Belloch, Maria del Mar – Tertiary Education and Management, 2013
This article examines the factors which contribute to the success of female academics engaging in research in social sciences. The data were obtained through a series of interviews carried out at public universities in Catalonia with women, all of whom were the heads of research groups recognized by the Generalitat de Catalunya (Catalan…
Descriptors: Females, College Faculty, Teaching Methods, Social Sciences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Boffo, Stefano; Chave, Daniel; Kaukonen, Erkki; Opdal, Liv Randi – European Journal of Education, 1999
Policies, commissioning bodies, methods, and criteria for both internal and external evaluation of research at universities in eight countries (Finland, Portugal, United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, Norway, Spain, France) are compared, and the effects of evaluations on the finance, structure, and research problems are examined. (MSE)
Descriptors: Comparative Education, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Foreign Countries