Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Prevention | 3 |
| Reading Failure | 3 |
| Remedial Reading | 3 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Case Studies | 1 |
| Change Strategies | 1 |
| Culture Conflict | 1 |
| Diagnostic Teaching | 1 |
| Early Intervention | 1 |
| Elementary School Students | 1 |
| Etiology | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Books | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Schoeller, Arthur W. – Instructor, 1972
A better developmental program, writes the author, must replace the old remedial'' approach, (Author/MB)
Descriptors: Diagnostic Teaching, Prevention, Reading Development, Reading Failure
Direct linkSherman, Lee; Ramsey, Betsy – Rowman & Littlefield Education, 2006
Reading disability and illiteracy are among the most pressing educational issues facing the United States today. At least 40 percent of America's fourth-graders are unable to read at grade level and a similar proportion of adults read at the lowest two levels of prose literacy. Here, the authors present an unflinching examination of the science…
Descriptors: Reading Failure, Illiteracy, Reading Difficulties, Case Studies
Peer reviewedMantzicopoulos, Panayota; And Others – Elementary School Journal, 1992
Compared the effects of TEACH, a perceptual remediation approach, to those of phonetic tutoring on first graders whose performance in the SEARCH Program during kindergarten indicated they were at risk for reading failure. There was no evidence for significant academic effects of participation in the TEACH program for at-risk children. (GLR)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Early Intervention, Elementary School Students, High Risk Students
