Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Experimental Psychology | 3 |
Priming | 3 |
Recall (Psychology) | 3 |
Cognitive Processes | 2 |
College Students | 2 |
Experiments | 2 |
Memory | 2 |
Associative Learning | 1 |
Attention Control | 1 |
Decision Making | 1 |
Efficiency | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Dewhurst, Stephen A. | 1 |
Epstude, Kai | 1 |
Heap, Shelly J. | 1 |
Howe, Mark L. | 1 |
Hutchison, Keith A. | 1 |
Knott, Lauren M. | 1 |
Mussweiler, Thomas | 1 |
Neely, James H. | 1 |
Thomas, Matthew A. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Knott, Lauren M.; Dewhurst, Stephen A.; Howe, Mark L. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2012
Factors that affect categorical and associative false memory illusions were investigated in 2 experiments. In Experiment 1, backward associative strength (BAS) from the list word to the critical lure and interitem connectivity were manipulated in Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) and category list types. For both recall and recognition tasks, the…
Descriptors: Priming, Language Tests, Memory, Experiments
Hutchison, Keith A.; Heap, Shelly J.; Neely, James H.; Thomas, Matthew A. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2014
Participants completed a battery of 3 attentional control (AC) tasks (OSPAN, antisaccade, and Stroop, as in Hutchison, 2007) and performed a lexical decision task with symmetrically associated (e.g., "sister-brother") and asymmetrically related primes and targets presented in both the forward (e.g., "atom-bomb") and backward…
Descriptors: Attention Control, Priming, Experimental Psychology, Associative Learning
Mussweiler, Thomas; Epstude, Kai – Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2009
Comparisons are a ubiquitous process in information processing. Seven studies examine whether, how, and when comparative thinking increases the efficiency of judgment and choice. Studies 1-4 demonstrate that procedurally priming participants to engage in more vs. less comparison influences how they process information about a target. Specifically,…
Descriptors: Recall (Psychology), Cognitive Processes, Foreign Countries, Efficiency