Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Cues | 2 |
| Oral Reading | 2 |
| Reading Processes | 2 |
| Reading Strategies | 2 |
| At Risk Students | 1 |
| Early Reading | 1 |
| Eye Movements | 1 |
| Grade 2 | 1 |
| Inferences | 1 |
| Measures (Individuals) | 1 |
| Miscue Analysis | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Arya, Poonam | 2 |
| Altwerger, Bess | 1 |
| Feathers, Karen M. | 1 |
| Martens, Prisca | 1 |
| Wilson, G. Pat | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Grade 2 | 2 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Does not meet standards | 1 |
Peer reviewed
Direct linkArya, Poonam; Feathers, Karen M. – Reading Psychology, 2012
This study highlights the complex reading processes of two primary grade struggling readers. It provides a more complete picture of the readers' use of all parts of a text, verbal and visual, to construct meaning during reading. The oral reading data show that students used various linguistic strategies to read words, and the eye-tracking data…
Descriptors: Primary Education, Grade 2, Reading Processes, At Risk Students
Wilson, G. Pat; Martens, Prisca; Arya, Poonam; Altwerger, Bess – Phi Delta Kappan, 2004
Are programs that emphasize systematic phonics instruction truly superior to other types of programs for young readers, as the National Reading Panel claims? The authors conducted a study of three different programs to see what kinds of readers are actually emerging from them. Two were commercial programs that used explicit and systematic phonics…
Descriptors: Reading Programs, Early Reading, Teaching Methods, Inferences
