Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| Psychological Studies | 1 |
| Reading Fluency | 1 |
| Reading Rate | 1 |
| Reading Research | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
| Short Term Memory | 1 |
| Spelling | 1 |
Source
| Visible Language | 1 |
Author
| Ormond, Jeanne Ellis | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedOrmond, Jeanne Ellis – Visible Language, 1986
Hypothesizes that good spellers read by full cues while poor spellers read by partial cues, and also investigates short term memory differences between the two groups. Finds good spellers were faster readers, better at identifying matches and mismatches between similar nonsense words, and had better short term memories than poor spellers. (SKC)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Cues, Psychological Studies, Reading Fluency
