Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Attention | 2 |
Reader Text Relationship | 2 |
Text Structure | 2 |
Cognitive Processes | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
Eye Movements | 1 |
Foreign Countries | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Human Body | 1 |
Learning | 1 |
Misconceptions | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Ariasi, Nicola | 1 |
D'Mello, Sidney K. | 1 |
Forrin, Noah D. | 1 |
Mason, Lucia | 1 |
Mills, Caitlin | 1 |
Risko, Evan F. | 1 |
Seli, Paul | 1 |
Smilek, Daniel | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Canada | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Forrin, Noah D.; Mills, Caitlin; D'Mello, Sidney K.; Risko, Evan F.; Smilek, Daniel; Seli, Paul – Journal of Experimental Education, 2021
The prevalence of the acronym tl;dr ("too long; didn't read") suggests that people intentionally disengage their attention from long sections of text. We studied this real-world phenomenon in an educational context by measuring rates of intentional and unintentional mind-wandering while undergraduate student participants (n = 80) read…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Reading Processes, Attention, Text Structure
Ariasi, Nicola; Mason, Lucia – Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2011
This study examined whether reading a refutational or non-refutational text would induce different cognitive processing, as revealed by eye-movement analyses. Unlike a standard expository text, a refutational text acknowledges a reader's alternative conceptions about a topic, refutes them, and then introduces scientific conceptions as viable…
Descriptors: Text Structure, Attention, Scientific Concepts, Human Body