NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Researchers3
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 31 to 45 of 87 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Masters, James R. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1974
Descriptors: Attitudes, Questionnaires, Rating Scales, Response Style (Tests)
Bardo, John W. – Southern Journal of Educational Research, 1978
Assumptions underlying Cooper's exact probability test for Likert-type scales are examined and found not always to hold true. A modification of his test is derived, differences in results obtained with the two tests are presented, and the significance of the results discussed. (KR)
Descriptors: Attitudes, Expectancy Tables, Probability, Rating Scales
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Alliger, George M.; Williams, Kevin J. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1992
The internal consistency of a scale and various indices of rating scale response styles (such as halo, leniency, and positive or negative response bias) are related to mean scale item intercorrelation. The consequent relationship between internal consistency and rating scale response styles is discussed. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Correlation, Evaluators, Interrater Reliability, Rating Scales
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gordon, Leonard V. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1971
Results indicate that extremeness response sets at the two ends of the continuum differentially contribute to scale validity. (MS)
Descriptors: Attitude Measures, Rating Scales, Response Style (Tests), Scoring Formulas
Stricker, Lawrence J. – 1973
The aims of this study were (1) to explore the factor structure of the Personality Research Form (PRF) and (2) to examine the inventory's relations with response styles. In general the PRF content scales correlated moderately with each other and with measures of acquiesence, social desirability, and defensiveness response Biases. Six oblique…
Descriptors: Correlation, Factor Analysis, Personality Studies, Rating Scales
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rounds, James B., Jr.; And Others – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1978
Two studies compared multiple rank order and paired comparison methods in terms of psychometric characteristics and user reactions. Individual and group item responses, preference counts, and Thurstone normal transform scale values obtained by the multiple rank order method were found to be similar to those obtained by paired comparisons.…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Measurement, Rating Scales, Response Style (Tests)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gordon, Michael E.; Gross, Ronald H. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1978
Past practice of operationalizing the concept of fakeability of psychological tests is reviewed. The strengths and weaknesses of these indices are discussed in the light of a proposed new definition of fakeability based upon Naylor's model of measurement accuracy. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Psychological Testing, Rating Scales, Response Style (Tests), Test Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Berman, Harry J.; And Others – Sociometry, 1976
Some encoders showed variations in feelings principally through visually mediated stimuli, others through the tone of the voice. These results are discussed in the context of quantitative versus qualitative differences among the communication channels. (Author/DEP)
Descriptors: Affective Measures, Auditory Stimuli, College Students, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Howard, George S.; And Others – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1979
Evaluations of experimental interventions which employ self-report measures are subject to contamination known as response-shift bias. Response-shift effects may be attenuated by substituting retrospective pretest ratings for the traditional self-report pretest ratings. This study indicated that the retrospective rating more accurately reflected…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Rating Scales, Response Style (Tests), Self Evaluation
Chandler, Theodore A.; And Others – Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 1976
Many self-concept measures employ several different scales to which the subject responds in a set order at one sitting. This study examined effects of different testing conditions. The Index of Adjustment and Values (IAV) was administered to 191 graduate students under two different sequences and two time delay conditions. Results indicate…
Descriptors: Evaluation, Measurement Techniques, Rating Scales, Research Projects
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gay, Melvin L.; And Others – Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1975
The Adult Self-Expression Scale is a 48-item, self-report measure of assertiveness designed for use with adults in general. Scale was found to have high test-retest reliability and moderate-to-high construct validity, as established by correlations with Adjective Check List scales and by a discriminant analysis procedure. (Author)
Descriptors: Adults, Assertiveness, Behavioral Science Research, Communication (Thought Transfer)
Grush, Joseph E. – 1975
Ten Turkish words were used as stimuli in an exposure experiment. Twenty-five students from the University of Illinois subject pool were divided into five subgroups, differing only with respect to which stimuli occurred in which exposure conditions. After the stimuli were evaluated on 7-point "good-bad" scales, subjects completed a questionnaire…
Descriptors: Association (Psychology), Attitude Change, Attitude Measures, Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Danford, Scott; Willems, Edwin P. – Environment and Behavior, 1975
Descriptors: Affective Measures, Architecture, Environmental Research, Rating Scales
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Loo, Robert – Psychology: A Quarterly Journal of Human Behavior, 1980
Results of statistical analyses suggest that high lie-scorers respond honestly, and that the Lie Scale for the Eysenck Personality Inventory may reflect a personality dimension of interest rather than an extraneous and undesirable factor to be eliminated. (Author)
Descriptors: Discriminant Analysis, Multidimensional Scaling, Personality Measures, Personality Traits
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bagby, R. Michael; Marshall, Margarita B. – Assessment, 2004
The authors assess the replicability of the two-factor model of underreporting response style. They then examine the relative performance of scales measuring these styles in analog (ARD) and differential prevalence group (DPG) designs. Principal components analysis produced a two-factor structure corresponding to self-deceptive (SD) and impression…
Descriptors: Measures (Individuals), Test Validity, Response Style (Tests), Personality Measures
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6