Descriptor
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 3 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 2 |
Guides - General | 1 |
Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Oregon | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Thorne, Gaylord L.; And Others – 1976
Between August 1973 and September 1976, a study was conducted of the process of assessing faculty in Oregon's colleges and universities. The two major objectives were to describe and analyze the factors influencing tenure and promotion decisions, and to develop incentive models to positively influence the quality of instruction. A faculty…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Scott, Craig S.; And Others – 1977
The Oregon State System of Higher Education recently completed a 3-year study entitled Faculty Teaching: Models for Assessment of Quality. Over 400 teaching and administrative faculty selected on a random or stratified basis answered the following questions: (1) What factors are considered in the assessment of faculty performance? (2) What…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Factor Structure, Faculty Evaluation
Regional Spotlight. News of Higher Education in the South, 1975
Because of the growing emphasis on tenure and faculty evaluation the Southern Regional Education Board conducted a survey of faculty evaluation procedures. Questionnaires received from 536 private and public institutions in a 14-state region illustrate the picture of who evaluates, how, and why. The survey showed that the department chairperson…
Descriptors: Advisory Committees, Alumni, College Faculty, Educational Administration

Eagle, Norman – Review of Higher Education, 1982
What happens to student ratings of instruction after instructors are promoted from one professorial rank to another, and what happens when faculty exhaust all material incentives, acquiring both tenure and the highest academic rank? These questions are examined and instructor rating questionnaire is provided. (MLW)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Factor Analysis, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion
Grasha, Tony – 1972
An overview of current approaches and perspectives for assessing faculty performance is presented. The evaluation principles and models are applicable for assessment goals of providing classroom feedback to an instructor, developing promotion, tenure and reappointment procedures, and offering an interface between faculty assessment and career…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion
Nagel, Thomas S.; Paixao, Lyra – 1971
This study investigates the differences among 65 instructors' performance in the San Diego State College Department of Elementary Education, according to their student ratings. Comparisons were made in relation to the instructors' employment situation--tenured and non-tenured; to their professional rank--assistant, associate or full professor; and…
Descriptors: Academic Rank (Professional), College Faculty, College Students, Elementary Education
Youngstown State Univ., OH. – 1982
The collective bargaining agreement between the Youngstown State University and Youngstown State University Chapter of the Ohio Education Association (395 members) of the National Education Association) covering the period June 15, 1982-June 14, 1986 is presented. Items covered in the agreement include: unit recognition, salaries by rank and…
Descriptors: Academic Rank (Professional), Collective Bargaining, College Faculty, Contracts