We appreciate Barry Cooper and Judith Glaesser's (henceforth CG) energy and effort put into reflecting on parts of our proposals laid out in "Set-theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences" (2012). We use our response to explain what enhanced standard analysis (ESA) is meant to achieve and what not, an issue about which CG hold erroneous beliefs. In making their flawed argument against ESA, CG do, however, bring up broader issues in the handling of logical remainders that, so far, have not been explicitly addressed, such as contradictory simplifying assumptions in the analysis of necessity for the outcomes Y and ~Y. We use our response to spell out these issues more explicitly, as is done by CG.