Descriptor
| Competence | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Legal Education (Professions) | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Professional Education | 1 |
| Professors | 1 |
| Publish or Perish Issue | 1 |
| Scholarship | 1 |
| Writing (Composition) | 1 |
| Writing for Publication | 1 |
Source
| Journal of Legal Education | 1 |
Author
| Elson, John S. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedElson, John S. – Journal of Legal Education, 1989
The legal academy's defense of the dominance of its scholarly mission has two critical shortcomings: it ignores the costs of that dominance to the goals of professional education, and it neglects to subject its premises to its own standards of scholarly scrutiny. (MLW)
Descriptors: Competence, Higher Education, Legal Education (Professions), Models
