Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Source
NASSP Bulletin | 28 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 12 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 5 |
Opinion Papers | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Grade 9 | 1 |
High Schools | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Practitioners | 5 |
Administrators | 4 |
Location
Maryland | 1 |
Missouri (Saint Louis) | 1 |
Wisconsin | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Rentsch, George J. – NASSP Bulletin, 1976
Administrators, who assess others, cannot themselves be immune from assessment. A plan for administrator assessment is offered. (Editor/RK)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Charts, Educational Objectives, Evaluation Criteria

Crews, Carole – NASSP Bulletin, 1981
Provides an evaluation model and outlines steps to take in planning for the evaluation process. Such planning and organizing ensures that the evaluation process is achieved systematically. (IRT)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Guidelines, Program Development, Secondary Education

Matczynski, Thomas; Rogus, Joseph – NASSP Bulletin, 1975
Convinced that most educators are shortsighted in planning curriculum design, these writers take the proverbial bull by the horns and present the criteria they feel are necessary for realistic program planning. (Editor)
Descriptors: Curriculum Design, Educational Problems, Evaluation Criteria, Program Development

Bickel, Lauri R. – NASSP Bulletin, 1995
When the four administrators at a Wisconsin high school indicated they would appreciate staff feedback about their performance, union representatives undertook the task of formalizing an evaluation agreement, developing an evaluation instrument, implementing the evaluation process, and reviewing assessment procedures. The instrument and written…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, High Schools, Program Development

Thompson, June E. – NASSP Bulletin, 1974
Experienced in the process of student evaluation of teachers, this author suggests ways of using student assessment to best advantage. (Editor)
Descriptors: Educational Objectives, Guidelines, Models, Program Development

Wray, Jerome A. – NASSP Bulletin, 1976
Vocational education must do more than prepare our youth for jobs that exist today. Not only might their skills be outdated by graduation, but job training does not in itself provide a complete education. Career education, properly defined, may be the answer. (Editor/RK)
Descriptors: Career Education, Evaluation Criteria, Human Development, Program Development

Beebe, Robert J. – NASSP Bulletin, 1987
Discusses development of the six components of any sound performance appraisal program: (1) explicit job descriptions, (2) definitions of key areas of responsibility, (3) criteria for performance appraisal, (4) methods for data collection and analysis, (5) written procedures, and (6) legal review of all procedures. (PGD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Personnel Evaluation, Program Development

Carlson, Robert; Mable, Ted – NASSP Bulletin, 1976
Evaluation, if not carefully planned and implemented, can do more harm than good. Describes a successful system used to monitor one recent educational innovation. (Editor/RK)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Evaluation Methods, Models, Program Development

Herman, Jerry J. – NASSP Bulletin, 1993
An effective administrator evaluation system builds in feedback opportunities, two-way communication, opportunities for improvement, enforcement of strengths, and a clear understanding of the system. The system must be valid, reliable, meaningful, useful, and feasible. Procedural answers to the why-what-when-where-what-who questions are discussed…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Due Process, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria

Iwanicki, Edward F. – NASSP Bulletin, 1976
Evaluation continues to be a common concern at the secondary school level. Administrators and teachers are interested in the skill and ability levels of their students. Takes a careful look at the evaluation process. (Editor/RK)
Descriptors: Check Lists, Educational Objectives, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods

Gaines, Joan – NASSP Bulletin, 1975
Asked whether their music programs are in danger because of current economic conditions or reduced pupil enrollments, six principals told the writer exactly what's happening to music instruction in their schools. (Editor)
Descriptors: Music Education, Music Teachers, Opinions, Principals

Dettre, John – NASSP Bulletin, 1975
This article challenges the value of the Carnegie Unit and proposes an alternative. The basic orientation for both the challenge and alternative is derived from the concept of "quality control." (Editor)
Descriptors: Ancillary School Services, Evaluation Criteria, Program Development, Quality Control

Johns, Frank; Tyrrell, Ronald – NASSP Bulletin, 1975
This article tells the story of how a university can develop an on-site inservice program for teachers that deals with day-to-day, real-life issues of teaching. Such a program benefits both the university and school participants. (Editor)
Descriptors: Inservice Education, Program Development, Program Evaluation, Teacher Attitudes

Hunsicker, Paul; Reiff, Guy – NASSP Bulletin, 1975
Physical education teaches basic life principles as well as motor skills that have long-lasting benefits. Yet, say these authors, it is usually the first curricular area to suffer school budget cuts. Criteria for a good physical education program are described with the implication that if the subject is properly taught it is more difficult to…
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Guidelines, Physical Education, Physical Fitness

Brockmann, Fred J. – NASSP Bulletin, 1972
Comparison of program budgeting with traditional budgeting systems. (SP)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Program Budgeting, Program Development, Program Evaluation
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2