Descriptor
Court Litigation | 4 |
High Schools | 4 |
Privacy | 4 |
Search and Seizure | 4 |
Drug Use Testing | 3 |
Student Rights | 3 |
Athletes | 2 |
Federal Courts | 2 |
School Law | 2 |
Athletics | 1 |
Confidentiality | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Indiana | 1 |
Pennsylvania | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Fourth Amendment | 2 |
New Jersey v TLO | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Zirkel, Perry A. – Phi Delta Kappan, 1999
By upholding a student's refusal to provide a urine sample, the Seventh Circuit Court correctly avoided further erosion of the Fourth Amendment's privacy principle. In "New Jersey v T.L.O." (1995), the U.S. Supreme Court shrunk the probable-cause standard to reasonable suspicion in the special context of public schools, retaining the…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Drug Use Testing, High Schools, Privacy
Pittman, Andrew T.; Slough, Mark R. – West's Education Law Quarterly, 1996
Addresses the Fourth Amendment constitutional challenges facing high school student-athlete drug testing programs and applies the findings in the U.S. Supreme Court decision in the "Vernonia versus Acton" case, the first drug-testing case involving high school student athletes to be decided by the Court, by recommending 12 safeguards…
Descriptors: Athletes, Court Litigation, Drug Use Testing, Federal Courts
Russo, Charles J.; Morse, Timothy E. – School Business Affairs, 1995
In "Acton," the Supreme Court upheld a local school board policy calling for the random, suspicionless drug testing of interscholastic student-athletes. Reviews the Court's holdings. Concludes that a drug-testing policy that is consistent with "Acton" and enjoys broad-based community support probably would be worth its expense.…
Descriptors: Athletes, Court Litigation, Drug Abuse, Drug Use Testing
Zirkel, Perry A. – Phi Delta Kappan, 2001
In a case involving a swim-team student's mandatory pregnancy test and a varsity coach's mishandling of confidentiality, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals awarded the coach qualified immunity, while rejecting the student's Fourth and First Amendment claims. Discretion and legal counsel would have helped. (MLH)
Descriptors: Athletics, Confidentiality, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation