In this article, I discuss a Canadian public school controversy and Supreme Court of Canada decision involving competing stakeholder rights to freedom of religion, safety and equality. Policy considerations that allowed one group of stakeholders to express their constitutional rights raised concerns among other stakeholders. A policy vacuum and a lack of guidelines for educational policy-makers exist as Canadian schools become increasingly diverse, and as more individuals assert their rights under the Canadian "Charter of Rights and Freedoms." I have provided a Stakeholder Model to help school officials navigate competing rights through non-arbitrary and constitutionally compatible policy decisions.