NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mendoza Ramos, Viviana; Vasquez-Correa, Juan C.; Cremers, Rani; Van Den Steen, Leen; Nöth, Elmar; De Bodt, Marc; Van Nuffelen, Gwen – International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 2021
Background: Imprecise articulation has a negative impact on speech intelligibility. Therefore, treatment of articulation is clinically relevant in patients with dysarthria. In order to be effective and according to the principles of motor learning, articulation therapy needs to be intensive, well organized, with adequate feedback and requires…
Descriptors: Speech Therapy, Articulation (Speech), Adults, Speech Impairments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Xu, Jinfen; Fan, Yumei; Xu, Qingting – Language Awareness, 2019
This laboratory-based research investigated how 40 university EFL learners responded to their peers' linguistic errors and made their moment-to-moment decisions of whether or not to provide corrective feedback (CF) to their peers' errors in task-based peer interaction. Data from the transcripts of videotaped pair interaction and audio-taped…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Error Correction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Yuksel, Dogan; Inan-Karagul, Banu; Fidan, Dilek – Educational Research and Reviews, 2017
This current study examined the effects of the type of errors learners make (that is, phonological, lexical and grammar), proficiency level of the learners (that is, A1, A2, B1, B2 and C1) and nature of the recasts (that is, long and short) on the uptake of the learners. The data of this study came from the video-recordings of A1, A2, B1, B2 and…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, College Students, Foreign Students, Second Language Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nooteboom, Sieb; Quene, Hugo – Journal of Memory and Language, 2008
This paper reports two experiments designed to investigate whether lexical bias in phonological speech errors is caused by immediate feedback of activation, by self-monitoring of inner speech, or by both. The experiments test a number of predictions derived from a model of self-monitoring of inner speech. This model assumes that, after an error in…
Descriptors: Inner Speech (Subvocal), Feedback (Response), Phonology, Error Patterns