ERIC - Search Results

Publication Date

In 2025	0
Since 2024	0
Since 2021 (last 5 years)	1
Since 2016 (last 10 years)	1
Since 2006 (last 20 years)	2

Descriptor

Foreign Countries	2
Phonemes	2
Speech Impairments	2
Articulation (Speech)	1
Assistive Technology	1
Children	1
Communication Skills	1
Comparative Analysis	1
Congenital Impairments	1
Correlation	1
Indo European Languages	1
Intervention	1
Longitudinal Studies	1
Models	1
Mutual Intelligibility	1
Outcomes of Treatment	1
Phonology	1
Quality of Life	1
Questionnaires	1
Scoring	1
Speech Therapy	1
More ▼

Source

International Journal of…	1
Journal of Speech, Language,…	1

Author

Alighieri, Cassandra	1
Bettens, Kim	1
Bruneel, Laura	1
D'haeseleer, Evelien	1
De Bodt, Marc	1
De Caesemaeker, Anne-Sophie	1
Demuynck, Kris	1
Martens, Jean-Pierre	1
Middag, Catherine	1
Van Lierde, Kristiane	1
Van Nuffelen, Gwen	1
More ▼

Publication Type

Journal Articles	2
Reports - Research	2

Education Level

Audience

Location

Belgium

Laws, Policies, & Programs

Assessments and Surveys

What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Showing all 2 results Save | Export

Is High-Intensity Speech Intervention Better? A Comparison of High-Intensity Intervention versus Low-Intensity Intervention in Children with a Cleft Palate

Peer reviewed

Direct link

Alighieri, Cassandra; Van Lierde, Kristiane; De Caesemaeker, Anne-Sophie; Demuynck, Kris; Bruneel, Laura; D'haeseleer, Evelien; Bettens, Kim – Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2021

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of speech intervention provided with a low intensity with speech intervention provided with a high intensity on the speech and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in Dutch-speaking children with a cleft palate with or without a cleft lip (CP ± L) between 4 and 12 years. Method: A…

Descriptors: Congenital Impairments, Longitudinal Studies, Speech Therapy, Speech Impairments

Speech Technology-Based Assessment of Phoneme Intelligibility in Dysarthria

Peer reviewed

Direct link

Van Nuffelen, Gwen; Middag, Catherine; De Bodt, Marc; Martens, Jean-Pierre – International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 2009

Background: Currently, clinicians mainly rely on perceptual judgements to assess intelligibility of dysarthric speech. Although often highly reliable, this procedure is subjective with a lot of intrinsic variables. Therefore, certain benefits can be expected from a speech technology-based intelligibility assessment. Previous attempts to develop an…

Descriptors: Articulation (Speech), Phonemes, Speech Impairments, Phonology