NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)1
Since 2006 (last 20 years)5
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 31 to 45 of 267 results Save | Export
Fassiotto, Michael E. – 1986
The types of merit pay increments and arguments for and against merit increments are reviewed, along with important variables a college should address when considering merit increments. The least common system at colleges and universities today is that of determining the entire faculty salary on the basis of merit. Most common at the university…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Employment Practices, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation
Newell, Susan; Price, James H. – Health Education (Washington D.C.), 1983
A study of criteria for promotion, tenure, and merit in college departments of health education revealed that fewer than half the colleges responding had a written policy on faculty advancement and that more than half the department chairpersons reported dissatisfaction with their institutions' policies. Suggested criteria are listed. (PP)
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, College Faculty, Department Heads, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Academe, 1997
The report, prepared by the American Association of University Professors' Committee A on Academic Freedom and Tenure, outlines new proposed policy on posttenure review of faculty. It presents arguments for and against the practice, discusses its use for dismissal purposes, offers guidelines for establishment of a system for periodic evaluation of…
Descriptors: Administrative Policy, College Faculty, Faculty Evaluation, Guidelines
Roueche, John E.; And Others – 1995
Drawing from a national survey of community colleges, this book documents trends in the employment and integration of part-time faculty in American community colleges. Chapter 1, "Focusing on the Problems: Part-Time Faculty in American Community Colleges," describes the economic, technological, and demographic imperatives generating the increased…
Descriptors: Community Colleges, Employment Patterns, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation
Seldin, Peter – 1984
A guide to understanding and improving faculty evaluation procedures at all types of colleges and universities is presented. The causes of today's crisis in higher education and survival strategies are reviewed, and the search for solvency is related to major changes in assessing faculty performance. The proliferation of court challenges to…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Court Litigation, Educational Change, Employment Practices
Andrews, Hans A.; Licata, Christine M.; Harris, Beverly Jo – 2002
This document summarizes a national study of how U.S. community colleges evaluate tenured professors. The report begins with an introduction to the current status of post-tenure evaluation and outlines the common arguments that frame the debate on the purpose and necessity of evaluating tenured faculty. The authors describe current assessment…
Descriptors: Community Colleges, Educational Practices, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Chait, Richard P.; Ford, Andrew T. – Change, 1982
Possible administrative policies to defer the tenure decision and slow the addition of tenured faculty are examined, including extended probationary periods, suspension or abolition of the "up-or-out" rule, term contracts, and change in tenure quotas. Examples of current use, strengths and weaknesses of alternatives, and opinions within the…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Planning, Contracts, Employment Practices
Nelson, Charles A. – Management Focus, 1982
Significant improvements in the quality of teaching and research can be achieved by college deans and presidents who have the courage to hire only the best available and terminate the unproductive and to devise the least disruptive means of doing so. Available from Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., 345 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10154. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, College Faculty, Cost Effectiveness, Efficiency
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Froh, Robert C.; And Others – New Directions for Higher Education, 1993
A discussion of faculty portfolios as evidence of how college faculty spend their time, for purposes of evaluation and reward, looks at the range of legitimate faculty work, its role in distribution of rewards, criteria for judging quality and quantity, and collection, analysis and reporting of this information. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation
Leatherman, Courtney – Chronicle of Higher Education, 1998
The American Association of University Professors (AAUP), long dismissive of the idea of post-tenure faculty evaluation, has adopted a new policy offering guidance on how such a system should be set up, while insisting it should not be used to revoke tenure. The group still clearly opposes requiring tenured professors to undergo formal, regular,…
Descriptors: Administrative Policy, College Faculty, Employment Practices, Evaluation Criteria
Andrews, Hans A. – 1986
In 1984-85, a nationwide survey was conducted of merit pay practices in community colleges to discover the impact of public pressure for merit pay on the community college system. Questionnaires were sent to more than 1,300 community, technical, and junior colleges, requesting information on the nature of faculty evaluation at each college. Study…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Community Colleges, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Seldin, Peter; And Others – Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 1995
Questions raised frequently by college and university faculty about use of portfolios to document effective teaching are answered. The questions address such issues as how the portfolio is organized, what it should reflect, how and by whom it is used, preparation time, the mentor's role, reliability, subjectivity, maintaining the portfolio's…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Arden, Eugene – Academe, 1995
A survey of 63 college provosts and academic vice presidents concerning evaluation of tenured faculty found that, although frequency and form of evaluation vary widely, the large majority of institutions do perform regular reviews of tenured faculty. Most respondents also felt that the tenure system works relatively well. (MSE)
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, College Administration, College Faculty, Educational Change
Pollicita, James R.; Hanna, Donald E. – 1983
A project to develop criteria for evaluating the quality of faculty outreach activities in continuing education and public service is described. The project, which was conducted at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, was also designed to achieve the utilization of these criteria by faculty members engaged in outreach and by staff who…
Descriptors: Continuing Education, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Guides
Fincher, Cameron – 1983
Basic questions concerning the purposes and functions of faculty evaluation in higher education are considered, along with background of the practice. It is contended that the purpose of faculty evaluation ought to be the improvement of instruction, and that the administrative uses of faculty evaluation for decisions of promotion, tenure, and…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Employment Practices, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  18