Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Faculty Evaluation | 267 |
Personnel Policy | 267 |
Higher Education | 233 |
College Faculty | 214 |
Tenure | 158 |
Employment Practices | 129 |
Faculty Promotion | 103 |
Teacher Salaries | 95 |
Contracts | 90 |
Fringe Benefits | 85 |
Grievance Procedures | 84 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Licata, Christine M. | 7 |
Andrews, Hans A. | 3 |
Chait, Richard P. | 3 |
Ford, Andrew T. | 3 |
Seldin, Peter | 3 |
Magner, Denise K. | 2 |
Morreale, Joseph C. | 2 |
Moses, Ingrid | 2 |
Olson, Gary A. | 2 |
Weinbach, Robert W. | 2 |
Abdelal, Ahmed T. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Higher Education | 7 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Practitioners | 92 |
Administrators | 38 |
Teachers | 25 |
Policymakers | 12 |
Location
Canada | 4 |
New York | 3 |
Arizona | 2 |
Australia | 2 |
Florida | 2 |
United States | 2 |
Alabama | 1 |
California | 1 |
Iowa | 1 |
New Zealand | 1 |
Pennsylvania | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Civil Rights Act 1964 Title… | 1 |
Equal Pay Act 1963 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Wayne State Univ., Detroit, MI. – 1974
This collective bargaining agreement between Wayne State University and the Wayne State Chapter of the American Association of University Professors covers the period from July 1, 1974 to June 30, 1976. Some issues discussed are: wages, hours, and other conditions of employment for the employees at Wayne State University. (Author/KE)
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, Collective Bargaining, Contracts, Faculty Evaluation
Berendzen, Richard; And Others – Journal of the College and University Personnel Association, 1981
A model of a system to evaluate administrators at the American University is presented. Evaluation objectives, program design criteria, the role of committees and supervisors, evaluation procedures, general policies, administrators subject to the policy, and an example of how this procedure would apply to specific cases are discussed. (MLW)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education

Morreale, Joseph C.; Licata, Christine M. – Innovative Higher Education, 1999
Discusses trends in policy concerning the evaluation and development of tenured college faculty, including the evolution of such policies, current policies, common approaches, and unifying principles that lead to successful implementation. Explores questions regarding impact, outcomes, costs, and benefits of post-tenure reviews. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation
George, Melvin D. – 1984
Personnel decisionmaking at colleges and universities is discussed, with consideration of ways to avoid legal problems. Two approaches are recommended for universities: develop procedures to minimize the risk of law suits by faculty members and school staff, and provide protection from lawsuits for faculty and staff. Institutional procedures that…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Employment Practices, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Miller, Richard I., Ed.; Holzapfel, Edward W., Jr., Ed. – New Directions for Community Colleges, 1988
This collection of essays provides an overview of personnel policies and practices in two-year colleges. The volume includes: (1) "The Personnel Function in Two-Year Colleges," by Priscilla Haag-Mutter and C. Wayne Jones, which considers historical antecedents, human resource development, future trends, and the role of planning; (2) "Organization…
Descriptors: College Administration, Community Colleges, Faculty Evaluation, Personnel Evaluation
Behrendt, Richard L.; Parsons, Michael H. – New Directions for Community Colleges, 1983
Considers the contrasting yet complementary relationship of accountability and parity with respect to part-time faculty. Using Hagerstown Junior College as a frame of reference, considers formative and summative evaluation objectives and procedures for part-time faculty evaluation. Looks at the utility of evaluation and its benefits to faculty and…
Descriptors: Accountability, Community Colleges, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation

Wenger, Robert B.; Girard, Dennis M. – Research in Higher Education, 2000
Presents a merit pay allocation model based on the principle of awarding comparable percentage salary increases to college/university faculty members with similar merit ratings. The model enables users to calculate merit pay amounts for individual faculty members in a systematic and efficient manner and can incorporate various policy directives…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Compensation (Remuneration), Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Licata, Christine M. – 1985
The evaluation process for tenured faculty at community colleges was studied. A total of 857 faculty and administrators from nine member colleges of the League for Innovation in the Community College completed questionnaires. Research concerns included: whether formal evaluation policies and procedures existed for tenured faculty; purposes of both…
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Community Colleges, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation

Bunzel, John H. – Change, 1975
The President of San Jose State University, noting that a major impact of collective bargaining in higher education will be in the area of academic standards, discusses the dispute over "open files," maintaining that confidentiality of peer judgement is the best way to assure candor and honesty in evaluating faculty performance. (JT)
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Collective Bargaining, Confidential Records, Confidentiality
Moses, Ingrid – Vestes, 1985
Results of a survey of attitudes of 100 faculty members at the University of Queensland concerning the institution's system of annual compulsory performance reviews, their benefits and disadvantages, and preferences about the structure and administration of the review system are discussed. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion

Tanner, John R. – Public Personnel Management, 1986
Reports on a study that analyzed change that occurred in faculty personnel policies in selected universities from 1972 through 1973. Notes that significant improvements were made in the areas of performance appraisal procedures, promotion systems, the use of position descriptions, and job evaluation systems. (Author/CH)
Descriptors: Change, Employer Employee Relationship, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Recruitment
Smith, Al – New Directions for Community Colleges, 1983
Provides a historic perspective for staff evaluation and descriptions of conceptual frameworks used in evaluation program planning. Recommends the Southern Regional Education Board's framework for faculty evaluation that includes the development of evaluation purposes; areas for examination; essential evaluation criteria, standards, and evidence;…
Descriptors: Community Colleges, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation

Olswang, Steven G.; Fantel, Jane T. – Journal of College and University Law, 1980
The separate concepts of tenure and academic freedom and their relation to one form of accountability measure--systematic reviews of the performance of tenured faculty--are examined. It is contended that those reviews can be conducted without infringing upon either academic freedom or the institution of tenure. (LB)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Accountability, Administrative Policy, Court Litigation

Hogan, Patrick Colm – Higher Education Review, 1998
Examines two aspects of faculty tenure decisions with ethical implications: criteria used in deciding to retain or dismiss a tenure candidate, and what is possible to judge with reasonable accuracy when evaluating such a candidate. Recommends that narrow, arbitrary evaluation criteria be avoided, including those promoted as "high academic…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, College Faculty, Decision Making, Employment Practices
Tracy, Dyanne M.; Muir, Sharon Pray – 1992
A faculty-developed, criterion-based merit pay plan is described in this paper. Participation among department members is voluntary, and peers allocate merit pay based on pre-established criteria. The plan includes three categories of expectations--teaching, scholarship, and service--which are evaluated at two performance levels--strong and…
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education