NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Olson, Gary A. – Chronicle of Higher Education, 2008
In spousal hires, university administrators too often fail to make the important distinction between partners who most likely would not have been hired under normal circumstances and, thus, could be a burden on an institution, and those who would be an attractive hire under any circumstances. One is a "trailing" spouse in need of "an…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Spouses, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation
Olson, Gary A. – Chronicle of Higher Education, 2007
The tenure system is a tenure of one's own making. It can be flexible, supple, and responsive to the diverse needs and life situations of faculty members, or it can be rigid and uncompromising. The tenure years need not be a time of high anxiety, but for that to happen, institutions will need to make structural changes in the tenure system. In…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Tenure, Personnel Management, Personnel Policy
Leatherman, Courtney – Chronicle of Higher Education, 1998
The American Association of University Professors (AAUP), long dismissive of the idea of post-tenure faculty evaluation, has adopted a new policy offering guidance on how such a system should be set up, while insisting it should not be used to revoke tenure. The group still clearly opposes requiring tenured professors to undergo formal, regular,…
Descriptors: Administrative Policy, College Faculty, Employment Practices, Evaluation Criteria
Magner, Denise K. – Chronicle of Higher Education, 1993
Because of the end of mandatory retirement for faculty in January 1994, colleges and universities are looking at ways to motivate faculty to retire before age 70. A variety of incentives are being considered, including early retirement bonuses, allowing retirees to teach courses and keep a campus office, and toughening tenure evaluations. (MSE)
Descriptors: Aging in Academia, College Administration, Compliance (Legal), Faculty Evaluation
Magner, Denise K. – Chronicle of Higher Education, 1997
A recent Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching report counters the conventional wisdom in academe that faculty research must be evaluated by standards different from those of teaching and service, maintaining that the different types of faculty work have much in common and must be judged similarly if teaching and service are to gain…
Descriptors: College Instruction, Educational Research, Employment Practices, Evaluation Criteria