NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
An Exploratory Examination of Faculty Evaluation and Merit Compensation Systems in Texas Colleges and Universities.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hunnicutt, Garland G.; And Others – CUPA Journal, 1991
A study determined and described the various methods used to evaluate faculty by chairs of management and/or marketing departments in Texas schools or colleges of business administration. In addition, it investigated administrator attitudes about merit and performance compensation systems and the potential problems and benefits stemming from their…
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Administrator Role, Business Administration Education, Department Heads
Merit Pay from the Faculty's Perspective.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Miller, Keith T. – CUPA Journal, 1992
A survey of 109 faculty in a private university investigated attitudes about merit pay. Results suggest need for changes in the design, implementation, and evaluation of merit pay systems. Recommendations are made for faculty input, accommodation of departmental preferences, group incentives, performance standards, professional development,…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Compensation (Remuneration), Departments, Evaluation Criteria
Tenure: Administrative versus Faculty Perspectives.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Premeaux, Shane R.; Mondy, R. Wayne – CUPA Journal, 1996
A survey of 1,331 business administration school faculty, department heads, and deans investigated attitudes concerning tenure. Results indicated most faculty believe tenure is necessary for academic freedom, but only half of department heads and deans agree. A majority of all three groups agree tenure is overapplied. Most also agree that tenure…
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Administrator Attitudes, Business Administration Education, Change Strategies