NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jamie Shaw – Research Evaluation, 2024
There has been a recent increase in attention toward the proper targets of evaluation in science funding policy. Specifically, some claim that we should 'fund people, not projects' to allow for increased autonomy for researchers. Critics argue that this movement unduly opens room for biases against several marginalized groups of scientists. In…
Descriptors: Scientific Research, Grants, Financial Support, Researchers
Howard, Jennifer – Chronicle of Higher Education, 2007
University presses have complained for years that tenure committees unfairly expect their editors to be arbiters of what counts as tenure-worthy work. At the same time, the presses have been caught in a business-side squeeze between dwindling sales (and shrinking subsidies) and the ever-greater pressure on scholars to publish. In this article, the…
Descriptors: Tenure, University Presses, College Faculty, Scholarship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Print, Murray; Hattie, John – Higher Education, 1997
A study tested a procedure to identify and weigh various indicators of college faculty research productivity, as one measure of program quality. Eighty-six faculty in 34 Australian schools of education were surveyed. Highly valued indicators of research productivity included refereed journal articles, peer reviewed books, and major competitive…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Competition, Educational Quality, Evaluation Criteria