NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Giora Alexandron; Aviram Berg; Jose A. Ruiperez-Valiente – IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2024
This article presents a general-purpose method for detecting cheating in online courses, which combines anomaly detection and supervised machine learning. Using features that are rooted in psychometrics and learning analytics literature, and capture anomalies in learner behavior and response patterns, we demonstrate that a classifier that is…
Descriptors: Cheating, Identification, Online Courses, Artificial Intelligence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Meljun Barnayha; Gamaliel Gonzales; Rachel Lavador; Jessamae Martel; Ma. Kathleen Urot; Roselyn Gonzales – Psychology in the Schools, 2025
This study examines the determinants of online academic dishonesty using the theory of planned behavior. We surveyed 1087 college students in Central Philippines and utilized a partial least squares-structural equation modeling analysis to evaluate a proposed model. Results demonstrate that 10 of the 11 hypothesized relationships are statistically…
Descriptors: Self Control, Cheating, Intervention, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Jill Oeding; Theresa Gunn; Jamie Seitz – Open Praxis, 2024
This quantitative study is designed to help educational institutions and instructors make informed decisions regarding the use of online proctoring software. The researchers studied the impact of proctoring software in online courses by comparing the final grades of two groups of online, undergraduate students who took the same online course with…
Descriptors: Supervision, Computer Software, Online Courses, Grades (Scholastic)
Andrea E. Green – ProQuest LLC, 2024
No solution can ultimately eliminate cheating in online courses. However, universities reserve funding for authentication systems to minimize the threat of cheating in online courses. Most higher education institutions use a combination of authentication methods to secure systems against impersonation attacks during online examinations.…
Descriptors: College Students, Cheating, Online Courses, Intervention
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Alireza Maleki – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2024
The evaluation of students in online education poses a notable challenge, primarily due to the potential violation of academic integrity caused by various forms of cheating during online examinations. This study aims to explore the perspectives of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners on the reasons for online exam cheating. The study was…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Distance Education, Online Courses
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rajlaxmi Chouhan – Learning: Research and Practice, 2024
This paper presents simple and intuitive strategies for effective online assessment of a freshman engineering course. The proposed strategies for unproctored online exams include creating multiple sets with identical options, using image-format questions, maintaining short duration of exam, and employing a rotational assignment. Unlike a…
Descriptors: Engineering Education, Tests, Electronic Learning, Supervision
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Daniel Woldeab; Thomas Brothen – International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 2024
In this study, we analyze undergraduate student responses in 1,364 surveys to better understand student reactions to online proctoring. We present findings regarding two aspects of student reactions to online proctoring: First, we assess whether students believe that the act of cheating in online exams diminishes the legitimacy of their courses;…
Descriptors: Supervision, Tests, Online Courses, Cheating
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Colin Green; Eric Brewe; Jillian Mellen; Adrienne Traxler; Sarah Scanlin – Physical Review Physics Education Research, 2024
This project aims to understand physics faculty responses to transitioning to online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. We surveyed 662 physics faculty from the United States following the Spring 2020 term; of these, 258 completed a follow-up survey after the Fall 2020 term. We used natural language processing to measure the sentiment scores…
Descriptors: Teacher Attitudes, Online Courses, Physics, Science Instruction