Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
National Competency Tests | 8 |
State Standards | 8 |
Test Results | 8 |
Comparative Analysis | 5 |
Accountability | 4 |
Achievement Tests | 3 |
Correlation | 3 |
Educational Improvement | 3 |
Federal Legislation | 3 |
Mathematics Tests | 3 |
Academic Achievement | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
National Center for Education… | 2 |
Online Submission | 2 |
Education Next | 1 |
Educational Leadership | 1 |
Educational Measurement:… | 1 |
Author
Bandeira de Mello, Victor | 2 |
Blankenship, Charles | 2 |
Chaney, Kassandra | 2 |
Esra, Phil | 2 |
Hikawa, Hiro | 2 |
McLaughlin, Don | 2 |
Rojas, Daniela | 2 |
William, Paul | 2 |
Wolman, Michael | 2 |
Carney, Dee | 1 |
Ho, Andrew D. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Evaluative | 5 |
Journal Articles | 3 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 2 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 5 |
Grade 4 | 2 |
Grade 8 | 2 |
Junior High Schools | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Texas (Austin) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 3 |
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
McLaughlin, Don; Bandeira de Mello, Victor; Blankenship, Charles; Chaney, Kassandra; Esra, Phil; Hikawa, Hiro; Rojas, Daniela; William, Paul; Wolman, Michael – National Center for Education Statistics, 2008
In late January through early March of 2003, the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) grade 4 and 8 reading and mathematics assessments were administered to representative samples of students in approximately 100 public schools in each state. The results of these assessments were announced in November 2003. Each state also carried…
Descriptors: National Competency Tests, Mathematics Tests, Achievement Tests, Grade 4
Stoneberg, Bert D. – Online Submission, 2007
The No Child Left Behind Act sanctions the use of NAEP scores to confirm state testing results. The U.S. Department of Education, as test developer, is responsible to set forth how NAEP scores are to be interpreted and used. Thus far, the Department has not published a clear set of guidelines for using NAEP achievement level scores to conduct a…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Test Results, Testing Programs, Guidelines
Ho, Andrew D. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2007
State test score trends are widely interpreted as indicators of educational improvement. To validate these interpretations, state test score trends are often compared to trends on other tests such as the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). These comparisons raise serious technical and substantive concerns. Technically, the most…
Descriptors: Test Results, Educational Improvement, National Competency Tests, Measures (Individuals)
McLaughlin, Don; Bandeira de Mello, Victor; Blankenship, Charles; Chaney, Kassandra; Esra, Phil; Hikawa, Hiro; Rojas, Daniela; William, Paul; Wolman, Michael – National Center for Education Statistics, 2008
In late January through early March of 2003, the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) grade 4 and 8 reading and mathematics assessments were administered to representative samples of students in approximately 100 public schools in each state. The results of these assessments were announced in November 2003. Each state also carried…
Descriptors: National Competency Tests, Mathematics Tests, Achievement Tests, Grade 4

Popham, W. James – Educational Leadership, 2005
Results of tests of students' skills and knowledge conducted by the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) and the state accountability tests required by the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) program should not be compared. The two tests are based on different standards and have different measurement functions and judging the results of one…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, National Competency Tests, Comparative Analysis, State Standards
Peyser, James A. – Education Next, 2006
There can be little doubt that there is wide variation in the rigor and quality of state standards and assessments. Moreover, it is clear that the vast majority of states have set their academic achievement bar far lower than federal standards, as measured by the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). Since No Child Left Behind (NCLB)…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Test Results, State Standards, Grants
Linn, Robert L.; And Others – 1991
The New Standards Project is a joint effort of the Learning Research and Development Center (LRDC) at the University of Pittsburgh (Pennsylvania) and the National Center on Education and the Economy toward creation of a national examination system based on performance assessments. This study explored the feasibility of comparing performance on…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Correlation, Educational Assessment, Elementary Secondary Education
Schmitt, Lisa; Carney, Dee – Online Submission, 2008
This PowerPoint report summarizes AISD student demographic and performance results at middle schools as of the end of the 2007-2008 school year.
Descriptors: Middle School Students, Academic Achievement, Test Results, School Districts