NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Teichert, Melonie A.; Schroeder, Maria J.; Lin, Shirley; Dillner, Debra K.; Komperda, Regis; Bunce, Diane M. – Journal of Chemical Education, 2020
On the basis of the results of two prior studies at the US Naval Academy (USNA), which described the choice of study resources and the self-reported learning approaches of students of differing achievement levels, the current investigation examines how students of differing achievement levels in general chemistry actually solve multiple-choice…
Descriptors: Problem Solving, Chemistry, Science Instruction, Science Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Towns, Marcy H. – Journal of Chemical Education, 2014
Chemistry faculty members are highly skilled in obtaining, analyzing, and interpreting physical measurements, but often they are less skilled in measuring student learning. This work provides guidance for chemistry faculty from the research literature on multiple-choice item development in chemistry. Areas covered include content, stem, and…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Test Construction, Psychometrics, Test Items
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Szeberenyi, Jozsef – Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 2009
Terms to be familiar with before you start to solve the test: protein synthesis, ribosomes, amino acids, peptides, peptide bond, polypeptide chain, N- and C-terminus, hemoglobin, [alpha]- and [beta]-globin chains, radioactive labeling, [[to the third power]H] and [[to the fourteenth power]C]leucine, cytosol, differential centrifugation, density…
Descriptors: Genetics, Chemistry, Problem Based Learning, Biology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Copeland, David A. – Journal of Chemical Education, 1972
Descriptors: Chemistry, College Science, Evaluation, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Barnett-Foster, Debora; Nagy, Philip – Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 1995
Analysis of response strategies employed by 261 undergraduate chemistry students when answering multiple-choice and stem-equivalent constructed-response questions revealed no significant differences in types of solution strategies or types of errors across test format. However, analysis of student oral reports revealed a higher frequency of…
Descriptors: Chemistry, Constructed Response, Educational Research, Educational Testing