NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)1
Since 2006 (last 20 years)2
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 15 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Villarroel, Verónica; Bloxham, Susan; Bruna, Daniela; Bruna, Carola; Herrera-Seda, Constanza – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2018
Authenticity has been identified as a key characteristic of assessment design which promotes learning. Authentic assessment aims to replicate the tasks and performance standards typically found in the world of work, and has been found to have a positive impact on student learning, autonomy, motivation, self-regulation and metacognition; abilities…
Descriptors: Performance Based Assessment, Barriers, Higher Education, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shaklee, Harriet; Hall, Laurie – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1983
College subjects (n=106) judged a set of 12 covariation problems structured so that each of four judgment rules would produce a distinctive judgment pattern on a problem set. The findings suggest that self-report is a weak basis for conclusions about sources of error in covariation judgment. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Evaluation Methods, Evaluative Thinking, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Reder, Lynne M. – Psychological Review, 1982
Judging plausibility is argued to be a more efficient strategy than direct retrieval (finding a propositional match) to judge a statement's truth. A proposed model contrasts the strategies in terms of verbatim memory and duration. Direct retrieval is faster when verbatim traces are strong, but plausibility judgment is more efficient over time.…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Evaluative Thinking, Higher Education, Models
VerLinden, Jay G. – 1983
A metacritical judging model for contest oral interpretation that evaluates the performer's critical decisions is designed to meet three criteria: (1) it attempts to incorporate the advances of oral interpretation scholars outside the forensics community with the activity at forensics tournaments, (2) it recognizes that forensics competition is…
Descriptors: Competition, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluative Thinking, Higher Education
Pavitt, Charles – 1990
One of the most valuable skills in group decision making is the ability to make trustworthy judgments about group performance. It follows from the "inferential model" of social cognition (Pavitt, 1989; Pavitt & Hight, 1986), that there are three types of judgments relevant to the group context: (1) behavioral (what the group did);…
Descriptors: Discussion Groups, Evaluative Thinking, Higher Education, Inferences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Faherty, Vincent E. – Journal of Education for Social Work, 1983
The potential for use of simulation and game theory in social work education to make problem solving more real and to supplement experience in analysis is examined. Simulation models, materials, methods, and topics are discussed. (MSE)
Descriptors: Class Activities, Curriculum Development, Evaluative Thinking, Game Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cooksey, Ray W.; Freebody, Peter – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1986
Applications of social judgment theory are discussed with respect to policy formation and decisionmaking in educational contexts. Interactive computer technology is described, which can execute social judgment analyses, provide cognitive feedback to the policymaker on selected policy parameters, compare the policies of several policymakers, and…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Cues, Decision Making, Educational Policy
Thomas, Nancy P. – Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting, 1993
Presents an investigation into situational characteristics and their relationship to factors affecting graduate students' judgments of the relevance of information; proposes new student orientation as an exercise in information retrieval; and explains a process model of socialization to meet new students' information needs. (Contains 14…
Descriptors: Evaluative Thinking, Graduate Students, Higher Education, Information Needs
Himes, Kenneth G. – 1983
Debate paradigms, which at one time established standards to help judges evaluate arguments and rules to guide debaters' argument choice and strategy selection, no longer offer consistent guidance for either judges or debaters. An increased emphasis on creativity and flexibility has led to a general unwillingness to use a rigid debate format. The…
Descriptors: Communication Research, Communication Skills, Debate, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Miller, Randolph A.; Schaffner, Kenneth F. – Journal of Medical Education, 1982
A course to introduce medical students to formal models of medical diagnostic reasoning at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine is described. The students are encouraged to integrate facts and concepts from the basic sciences into strategies of diagnostic reasoning. (MLW)
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Computer Oriented Programs, Course Descriptions, Evaluative Thinking
Chacon, Fabio J. – 1981
A model is presented for response to evaluating instruction in a university based on the teaching-at-a-distance concept. Technically appropriate and operationally viable, this model is applied to the National Open University of Venezuela (UNA). The model is based on two principles of educational evaluation: (1) the concept of evaluation as a…
Descriptors: College Instruction, Course Evaluation, Course Objectives, Evaluation Criteria
Fadely, Dean – 1982
College debaters who go to law school are often surprised by the differences between the processes that take place in the court of reason and the process that takes place in the court of law. The court of reason relies mainly on authoritative testimony, while the court of law relies on direct evidence. Evidence in the court of reason is either…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Court Litigation, Court Role, Debate
Kurfiss, Joanne Gainen – 1988
The formal development of critical thinking is discussed, and guidance is provided to help faculty insure that critical thinking becomes an integral part of learning. Theory, research, teaching practice, and college programs pertinent to the development and role of critical thinking are presented in order to show how educators have shaped…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, College Instruction, College Students, Critical Thinking
North East Association for Institutional Research. – 1988
The 1988 annual conference of the North East Association for Institutional Research focused on strategic choice. Selected papers included: "Fact Books: Paper-Based or Electronic?" (T. Gusler); "Electronic Factbooks" (J. Jacobsen); "A Comparative Analysis of Community College Administrators' and Adult Evening Credit Course…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Admission Criteria, Adult Learning, Alumni
International Association for Development of the Information Society, 2012
The IADIS CELDA 2012 Conference intention was to address the main issues concerned with evolving learning processes and supporting pedagogies and applications in the digital age. There had been advances in both cognitive psychology and computing that have affected the educational arena. The convergence of these two disciplines is increasing at a…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Persistence, Academic Support Services, Access to Computers