NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 9 results Save | Export
Scriven, Michael
A model checklist conceptualizing the evaluation process is presented and discussed. It is quite general and is intended to apply to the evaluation of educational products, procedures and most outcomes. The Pathway Comparison Model consists of the following: (1) characterization--how generally or specifically to describe the "treatment"; (2)…
Descriptors: Cost Effectiveness, Educational Needs, Educational Objectives, Evaluation
Scriven, Michael – 1975
Selected aspects of the problem of obtaining unbiased program or product evaluation are discussed. An evaluator who is a member of the project staff will have difficulty producing an evaluation which is credible and valid. Project monitors will also have a problem since they are often required to assume the conflicting roles of external evaluator…
Descriptors: Administrative Problems, Bias, Credibility, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Scriven, Michael – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1993
Seven chapters present 31 propositions challenging traditional ideas about the nature and practice of program evaluation. Methods to improve evaluation models and approaches and ways to address intermediate and advanced evaluation issues are explored. The discussion also serves as an introduction to the most analytical and comprehensive of the…
Descriptors: Bias, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems, Evaluation Utilization
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Scriven, Michael – Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 2002
Uses a dialogue format to critique the arguments of W. Roth and M. Tobin for a radical departure from traditional conceptions and discussions of teacher evaluation. Makes the case that before considering radical new approaches, evaluators should understand strengths and weaknesses of existing models. (SLD)
Descriptors: Educational Change, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Scriven, Michael – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1995
The emergence of and relationship between two notions in personnel evaluation, merit and worth, are traced. How worth should be evaluated, and whether teacher evaluation is worth what it costs are discussed. Limitations of current approaches to teacher evaluation are reviewed, and the potential of a duties-based approach is noted. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cost Effectiveness, Evaluation Methods, Integrated Activities, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Coryn, Chris L. S.; Hattie, John A.; Scriven, Michael; Hartmann, David J. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2007
This research describes, classifies, and comparatively evaluates national models and mechanisms used to evaluate research and allocate research funding in 16 countries. Although these models and mechanisms vary widely in terms of how research is evaluated and financed, nearly all share the common characteristic of relating funding to some measure…
Descriptors: Ethics, Evaluation Methods, Comparative Analysis, Resource Allocation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Scriven, Michael – Education and Urban Society, 1980
To promote effective evaluation of the 4-H program, develops a matrix that identifies unintended and intended consequences of the program. After discussing objectives and activities of 4-H, concludes that the program has effectively incorporated good delivery modes and appropriate selection of materials to make an important contribution to…
Descriptors: Activities, Educational Objectives, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Scriven, Michael – Education and Urban Society, 1980
Discusses the evaluation matrix used in the national evaluation of the 4-H program and identifies where the payoffs for society in terms of learning for children are likely to occur, revealing results of the evaluation in comparison to expected payoffs. (CS)
Descriptors: Design, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Extension Education
Scriven, Michael
This paper was commissioned to develop new perspectives on the evaluation of the National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) for Citizenship and Social Studies. It criticizes the assessment model and advocates three new approaches to evaluating social studies education: a comparative approach with direct international comparisons of programs…
Descriptors: Citizenship, Citizenship Education, Educational Assessment, Educational Objectives