Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Experimental Psychology | 3 |
Models | 3 |
Eye Movements | 2 |
Brain | 1 |
Cognitive Processes | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
Computation | 1 |
Correlation | 1 |
Data Analysis | 1 |
Diagnostic Tests | 1 |
Experiments | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Kliegl, Reinhold | 3 |
Dimigen, Olaf | 1 |
Hohenstein, Sven | 1 |
Hohlfeld, Annette | 1 |
Jacobs, Arthur M. | 1 |
Laubrock, Jochen | 1 |
Sommer, Werner | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
High Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
Germany | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Hohenstein, Sven; Laubrock, Jochen; Kliegl, Reinhold – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2010
Eye movements in reading are sensitive to foveal and parafoveal word features. Whereas the influence of orthographic or phonological parafoveal information on gaze control is undisputed, there has been no reliable evidence for early parafoveal extraction of semantic information in alphabetic script. Using a novel combination of the gaze-contingent…
Descriptors: Semantics, Eye Movements, Human Body, Word Processing
Dimigen, Olaf; Sommer, Werner; Hohlfeld, Annette; Jacobs, Arthur M.; Kliegl, Reinhold – Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2011
Brain-electric correlates of reading have traditionally been studied with word-by-word presentation, a condition that eliminates important aspects of the normal reading process and precludes direct comparisons between neural activity and oculomotor behavior. In the present study, we investigated effects of word predictability on eye movements (EM)…
Descriptors: Video Technology, Sentences, Reading, Eye Movements
Kliegl, Reinhold – Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2007
K. Rayner, A. Pollatsek, D. Drieghe, T. J. Slattery, and E. D. Reichle argued that the R. Kliegl, A. Nuthmann, and R. Engbert corpus-analytic evidence for distributed processing during reading should not be accepted because (a) there might be problems of multicollinearity, (b) the distinction between content and function words and the skipping…
Descriptors: Reading Research, Word Frequency, Language Processing, Correlation