Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Experimental Psychology | 2 |
| Memory | 2 |
| Models | 2 |
| Recall (Psychology) | 2 |
| Associative Learning | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Computation | 1 |
| Context Effect | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| Experiments | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Experimental… | 2 |
Author
| Kahana, Michael J. | 2 |
| Rizzuto, Daniel S. | 1 |
| Schneider, Abraham R. | 1 |
| Siegel, Lynn L. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Pennsylvania | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkSiegel, Lynn L.; Kahana, Michael J. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2014
Repeating an item in a list benefits recall performance, and this benefit increases when the repetitions are spaced apart (Madigan, 1969; Melton, 1970). Retrieved context theory incorporates 2 mechanisms that account for these effects: contextual variability and study-phase retrieval. Specifically, if an item presented at position "i" is…
Descriptors: Memory, Recall (Psychology), Context Effect, Cues
Kahana, Michael J.; Rizzuto, Daniel S.; Schneider, Abraham R. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2005
This article addresses the relation between item recognition and associative (cued) recall. Going beyond measures of performance on each task, the analysis focuses on the degree to which the contingency between successful recognition and successful recall of a studied item reflects the commonality of memory processes underlying the recognition and…
Descriptors: Correlation, Recognition (Psychology), Recall (Psychology), Models
