NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mickes, Laura; Seale-Carlisle, Travis M.; Wixted, John T. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2013
Although frequently used with recognition, a few studies have used the Remember/Know procedure with free recall. In each case, participants gave Know judgments to a significant number of recalled items (items that were presumably not remembered on the basis of familiarity). What do these Know judgments mean? We investigated this issue using a…
Descriptors: Accuracy, Familiarity, Recall (Psychology), Task Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wixted, John T.; Mickes, Laura – Psychological Review, 2010
The dual-process theory of recognition memory holds that recognition decisions can be based on recollection or familiarity, and the remember/know procedure is widely used to investigate those 2 processes. Dual-process theory in general and the remember/know procedure in particular have been challenged by an alternative strength-based…
Descriptors: Memory, Recognition (Psychology), Recall (Psychology), Familiarity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mickes, Laura; Johnson, Emily M.; Wixted, John T. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2010
Recollection has long been thought to play a key role in associative recognition tasks. Evidence that associative recollection might be a threshold process has come from analyses of the associative recognition receiver operating characteristic (ROC). Specifically, the ROC is not as curvilinear as a signal detection theory requires. In addition,…
Descriptors: Research Papers (Students), Familiarity, Grading, Undergraduate Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mickes, Laura; Hwe, Vivian; Wais, Peter E.; Wixted, John T. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2011
People are generally skilled at using a confidence scale to rate the strength of their memories over a wide range. Specifically, low-confidence recognition decisions are often associated with close-to-chance accuracy, whereas high-confidence recognition decisions can be associated with close-to-perfect accuracy. However, using a 20-point rating…
Descriptors: Expertise, Familiarity, Rating Scales, Children