Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Benchmarking | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Identification | 1 |
| Measures (Individuals) | 1 |
| Psychometrics | 1 |
| Reliability | 1 |
| Response to Intervention | 1 |
| Simulation | 1 |
| Statistical Analysis | 1 |
Source
| Topics in Language Disorders | 1 |
Author
| Barth, Amy E. | 1 |
| Denton, Carolyn | 1 |
| Fletcher, Jack M. | 1 |
| Francis, David J. | 1 |
| Miciak, Jeremy | 1 |
| Stuebing, Karla K. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkFletcher, Jack M.; Stuebing, Karla K.; Barth, Amy E.; Miciak, Jeremy; Francis, David J.; Denton, Carolyn – Topics in Language Disorders, 2014
Purpose: Agreement across methods for identifying students as inadequate responders or as learning disabled is often poor. We report (1) an empirical examination of final status (postintervention benchmarks) and dual-discrepancy growth methods based on growth during the intervention and final status for assessing response to intervention and (2) a…
Descriptors: Response to Intervention, Comparative Analysis, Simulation, Psychometrics
