Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Learning Strategies | 3 |
Metacognition | 3 |
Student Attitudes | 2 |
Adult Development | 1 |
Age Differences | 1 |
Associative Learning | 1 |
Barriers | 1 |
Biology | 1 |
Case Studies | 1 |
Cognitive Style | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Deborah Ososanya | 1 |
Dunlosky, John | 1 |
Dye, Kathryn Morris | 1 |
Hertzog, Christopher | 1 |
Julie Dangremond Stanton | 1 |
Kira A. Yamini | 1 |
Rayna J. Carter | 1 |
Sinclair, Starlette M. | 1 |
Stanton, Julie Dangremond | 1 |
Stephanie M. Halmo | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Georgia | 3 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Julie Dangremond Stanton; Stephanie M. Halmo; Rayna J. Carter; Kira A. Yamini; Deborah Ososanya – Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 2024
Students with strong metacognitive skills are positioned to learn and achieve more than peers who are still developing their metacognition. Yet, many students come to college without well-developed metacognitive skills. As part of a longitudinal study on metacognitive development, we asked when, why, and how first-year life science majors use…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Majors (Students), Misconceptions, Science Tests
Dye, Kathryn Morris; Stanton, Julie Dangremond – CBE - Life Sciences Education, 2017
Students with awareness and control of their own thinking can learn more and perform better than students who are not metacognitive. Metacognitive regulation is how you control your thinking in order to learn. It includes the skill of evaluation, which is the ability to appraise your approaches to learning and then modify future plans based on…
Descriptors: Metacognition, Biology, Self Evaluation (Individuals), Learning Strategies
Hertzog, Christopher; Sinclair, Starlette M.; Dunlosky, John – Developmental Psychology, 2010
Researchers of metacognitive development in adulthood have exclusively used extreme-age-groups designs. We used a full cross-sectional sample (N = 285, age range: 18-80) to evaluate how associative relatedness and encoding strategies influence judgments of learning (JOLs) in adulthood. Participants studied related and unrelated word pairs and made…
Descriptors: Cues, Age Differences, Adult Development, Metacognition