Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Learning Processes | 22 |
Review (Reexamination) | 22 |
Higher Education | 12 |
Recall (Psychology) | 12 |
Notetaking | 6 |
College Students | 5 |
Learning Strategies | 5 |
Lecture Method | 5 |
Memory | 5 |
Retention (Psychology) | 5 |
Study Skills | 5 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 22 |
Journal Articles | 15 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 4 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 2 |
Grade 8 | 1 |
High Schools | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Junior High Schools | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Germany | 1 |
Sweden | 1 |
United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Hidden Figures Test | 1 |
Nelson Denny Reading Tests | 1 |
Sarason Test Anxiety Scale | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Anna Jakobsson; Jenny Loberg; Maria Kjörk – International Journal of Science Education, 2024
Retrieval-based learning, using tests for content review, frequently proves more effective for knowledge retention compared to alternative methods. Extensive research has explored this with older students, often in contrast to more passive techniques like rereading or note rewriting, typically focusing on vocabulary content, in non-classroom…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Elementary School Students, Science Instruction, Recall (Psychology)
Roelle, Julian; Renkl, Alexander – Journal of Educational Psychology, 2020
Example-based learning often uses a design in which learners first receive basic instructional explanations of new principles and concepts and then examples thereof. In this sequence, it is crucial that learners self-explain by using the content of the basic instructional explanations to elaborate on the examples. Typically, learners are not…
Descriptors: Demonstrations (Educational), Self Concept, High School Students, Instructional Effectiveness
Grenfell-Essam, Rachel; Ward, Geoff; Tan, Lydia – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2013
Participants tend to initiate immediate free recall (IFR) of short lists of words with the very first word on the list. Three experiments examined whether rehearsal is necessary for this recent finding. In Experiment 1, participants were presented with lists of between 2 and 12 words for IFR at a fast, medium, or slow rate, with and without…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Recall (Psychology), Review (Reexamination), Repetition
Hwang, Wu-Yuin; Chen, Nian-Shing; Shadiev, Rustam; Li, Jin-Sing – British Journal of Educational Technology, 2011
Previous studies have demonstrated that making annotations can be a meaningful and useful learning method that promote metacognition and enhance learning achievement. A web-based annotation system, Virtual Pen (VPEN), which provides for the creation and review of annotations and homework solutions, has been developed to foster learning process…
Descriptors: Homework, Metacognition, Learning Strategies, Learning Processes

Thompson, Charles P.; Barnett, Camilia – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1985
Two experiments were performed with college students to study memory monitoring during the learning of word lists. Both experiments suggested that successful monitoring to decide which items were already encoded did not occur during presentation of material but was restricted to recall trials. (Author/BS)
Descriptors: College Students, Higher Education, Learning Processes, Metacognition

Nungester, Ronald J.; Duchastel, Philippe C. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1982
High school students studied a brief history text, then either took a test on the passage, spent equivalent time reviewing, or went to an unrelated task. A test given two weeks later indicated that the test condition resulted in better retention than either the review or control conditions. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: High Schools, Learning Processes, Retention (Psychology), Review (Reexamination)

Sefkow, Susan B.; Myers, Jerome L. – American Educational Research Journal, 1980
Two experiments were performed to determine whether questions inserted after prose passages initiate reviews which facilitate retention of the information in memory. Results suggest that the backward review is not attributed to a retrieval phenomenon but to a strengthening of memory traces at the time of the probe. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Learning Processes, Memory, Prose
Yu, Howard K.; Berliner, David C. – 1981
Four different methods for attending to a lecture were studied: listening, listening with an outline, note-taking, and note-taking with an outline. Each method was designed to influence the learner's level of processing and, therefore, to effect the encoding and retrieval of information from a lecture. In addition, the effects of no review or…
Descriptors: Advance Organizers, Cues, Higher Education, Learning Processes

Barnett, Jerrold E.; And Others – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1981
Two experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of note taking and reviewing on learning from text. The findings supported the encoding function of note taking and demonstrated that unguided elaboration hindered performance on teacher-made tests. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Learning Activities, Learning Processes, Performance Factors

Duchastel, Philippe C.; Nungester, Ronald J. – Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1984
The effects on retention of adjunct questions either placed at the end of a passage or inserted after their respective paragraphs within the passage were examined. Both treatments led to superior retention of the previously questioned facts. The position of the adjunct questions did not differentially affect performance. (Author/BW)
Descriptors: Advance Organizers, High Schools, Learning Processes, Questioning Techniques

Andre, Thomas – Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1981
College students read prose passages and answered either verbatim or paraphrased inserted questions while reading under review or no review conditions. On a posttest students who received paraphrased questions outperformed students who received verbatim questions. This result supported the contention that paraphrased adjunct questions could…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Higher Education, Learning Processes, Memory
Snyder, Vivian – 1984
Three methods for studying college textbook chapters were compared, with 50 college special admissions students as subjects. Utilizing a counterbalanced design, students enrolled in a study skills course were given instruction in three study techniques: SQ3R, outlining, and underlining. The SQ3R method (Francis Robinson, 1946) consists of five…
Descriptors: College Students, Educational Research, High Risk Students, Higher Education
Henk, William A.; Stahl, Norman A. – 1985
The usefulness of taking notes to enhance recall was assessed, based on reviewing the research literature using the techniques of meta-analysis. Meta-analysis allows for both the computation of the strength of an effect within studies and the determination of mean effect sizes averaged across related studies. Fourteen studies that maintained…
Descriptors: College Instruction, Educational Research, Encoding (Psychology), Higher Education
Zambon, Franco – 1997
This study sought to determine a useful frequency for refreshing students' memories of complex procedures that involved a formal computer language. Students were required to execute the Microsoft Disc Operating System (MS-DOS) commands for "copy,""backup," and "restore." A total of 126 college students enrolled in six…
Descriptors: College Students, Computer Literacy, Higher Education, Learning Processes

Tobias, Sigmund – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1987
Students were randomly assigned to read a text passage displayed on microcomputers in one of four conditions: (1) required reviewing of main; or (2) alternate text when responses to adjunct questions were incorrect; (3) reading with adjunct questions; and (4) reading without adjunct questions. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: Aptitude Treatment Interaction, High Schools, Learning Processes, Microcomputers
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1 | 2