Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Grade 4 | 2 |
| Intervention | 2 |
| Learning Disabilities | 2 |
| Reading Achievement | 2 |
| Reading Failure | 2 |
| At Risk Students | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Cutting Scores | 1 |
| Disability Identification | 1 |
| Experimental Groups | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| Grade 4 | 2 |
| Grade 1 | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
| Grade 5 | 1 |
Audience
Location
| United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| Gray Oral Reading Test | 1 |
| Wechsler Intelligence Scale… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Does not meet standards | 1 |
Direct linkTucker, Christine N. – ProQuest LLC, 2010
Many schools in the United States use the IQ-achievement discrepancy method to identify children with learning disabilities (a significant split between their intelligence and their achievement skills). Unfortunately struggling students who are not identified by this method remain in the regular education setting with no additional supports and…
Descriptors: Reading Difficulties, At Risk Students, Social Change, Grade 4
Peer reviewedDunn, Michael W. – Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2010
A debate exists in the research community about replacing the traditional IQ/achievement discrepancy method for learning disability identification with a "response-to-intervention model". This new assessment paradigm uses a student's level of improvement with small-group or individual programming to determine a possible need for…
Descriptors: Intervention, Learning Disabilities, Reading Failure, Disability Identification
