Descriptor
| Algorithms | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| College Science | 1 |
| Curriculum Design | 1 |
| Engineering | 1 |
| Engineering Education | 1 |
| Learning | 1 |
| Learning Modalities | 1 |
| Nonverbal Learning | 1 |
| Professional Education | 1 |
| Science Instruction | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Engineering Education | 1 |
Author
| Scanlan, David | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 1 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Scanlan, David – Engineering Education, 1988
Notes that almost all computer engineering textbooks present algorithms using only verbal methods. Poses that engineering students' ability to handle graphic representation is crucial yet information is presented verbally. Summarizes the results of 12 replications on learner preference for graphic or verbal algorithmic techniques. (MVL)
Descriptors: Algorithms, Cognitive Processes, College Science, Curriculum Design
