NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Source
Discourse Processes: A…76
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 76 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Q. Feltgen; G. Cislaru – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2025
The broader aim of this study is the corpus-based investigation of the written language production process. To this end, temporal markers have been keylog recorded alongside the writing processes to exploit pauses to segment the speech product into linear units of performance. However, identifying these pauses requires selecting the relevant…
Descriptors: Writing Processes, Writing Skills, Written Language, Intervals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cokal, Derya; Filik, Ruth; Sturt, Patrick; Poesio, Massimo – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2023
Corpus evidence suggests that in contexts in which the presence of multiple antecedents might favor plural reference, the disadvantage observed for singular reference may disappear if the potential antecedents are combined in a group-like plural entity. We examined the relative salience of antecedents in conditions where the context either made a…
Descriptors: Morphemes, Form Classes (Languages), Semantics, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Guan, Shuang; Arnold, Jennifer E. – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2021
In discourses involving implicit causality, the implicit cause of the event is referentially predictable, that is, it is likely to be rementioned. However, it is unclear how referential predictability is calculated. We test two possible explanations: (1) The frequency account suggests that people learn that implicit causes are predictable through…
Descriptors: Influences, Prediction, Incidence, Comprehension
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wu, Ying Choon; Müller, Horst M.; Coulson, Seana – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2022
Multi-modal discourse comprehension requires speakers to combine information from speech and gestures. To date, little research has addressed the cognitive resources that underlie these processes. Here we used a dual-task paradigm to test the relative importance of verbal and visuospatial working memory in speech-gesture comprehension. Healthy,…
Descriptors: Short Term Memory, Comprehension, Nonverbal Communication, Speech
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Eekhof, Lynn S.; Kuijpers, Moniek M.; Faber, Myrthe; Gao, Xin; Mak, Marloes; van den Hoven, Emiel; Willems, Roel M. – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2021
This article explores the relationship between low- and high-level aspects of reading by studying the interplay between word processing, as measured with eye tracking, and narrative absorption and liking, as measured with questionnaires. Specifically, we focused on how individual differences in sensitivity to lexical word characteristics--measured…
Descriptors: Reading, Language Processing, Eye Movements, Individual Differences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
McNamara, Danielle S. – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2021
This article provides a commentary within the special issue, Integration: The Keystone of Comprehension. According to most contemporary frameworks, a driving force in comprehension is the reader's ability to generate the links among the words and sentences (ideas) in the texts and between the ideas in the text and what the readers already know. As…
Descriptors: Inferences, Language Processing, Reading Comprehension, Reading Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lee, Eun-Kyung; Lam, Tuan Q.; Watson, Duane G. – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2021
Although it is clear that unaccented referring expressions are associated with given information in a discourse, it is less clear what aspects of givenness are relevant. We examine whether listeners' expectation of givenness depends on repetition of a referring expression or on contextual evocation of a referent. The results from two visual world…
Descriptors: Discourse Analysis, Visual Stimuli, Eye Movements, Listening Comprehension
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Skalicky, Stephen – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2022
Informed by a theoretical model of satirical uptake, this study investigated processing behavior and comprehension of satirical news articles. Reading times for segments of minimally different satirical and non-satirical texts were collected using within-subjects (Experiment 1) and between-subjects (Experiment 2) designs. Segment reading times and…
Descriptors: Satire, Language Processing, Reading Rate, Prediction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Delgado, Pablo; Salmerón, Ladislao – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2022
In the present article, we examined the effect of the reading medium and the reading time-frame on text processing, metacognitive monitoring of comprehension, and comprehension outcomes. The eye movements of 116 undergraduates were recorded while they read three texts in print and three texts on a tablet under self-paced reading time or under time…
Descriptors: Reading Processes, Language Processing, Reading Comprehension, Printed Materials
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Marco S. G. Senaldi; Debra Titone – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Past work has suggested that L1 readers retrieve idioms (i.e., "spill the tea") directly vs. matched literal controls ("drink the tea") following unbiased contexts, whereas L2 readers process idioms more compositionally. However, it is unclear whether this occurs when a figuratively or literally biased context…
Descriptors: Eye Movements, Native Language, Second Language Learning, Figurative Language
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Göbel, Alexander; Frazier, Lyn; Clifton, Charles, Jr. – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2021
Recent studies of appositives have turned up differences between sentence-medial appositives and sentence-final appositives, for instance, in their availability for discourse continuations. Three experiments investigated whether medial appositives are more difficult to comprehend than final appositives and if so why. Experiment 1 tested…
Descriptors: Morphemes, Phrase Structure, Figurative Language, Discourse Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
John Hollander; John Sabatini; Art Graesser; Daphne Greenberg; Tenaha O'Reilly; Jan Frijters – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2023
Adult literacy learners are characterized by their diversity, both in terms of educational histories and cognitive skill sets. Accounting for the specific strengths and weaknesses of each learner is vital to the assessment of literacy gains and optimization of educational systems. We examined pre- and post-difference scores on a component reading…
Descriptors: Adult Literacy, Adult Education, Adult Students, Student Characteristics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Trott, Sean; Bergen, Benjamin – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2020
People often speak indirectly. For example, "It's cold in here" might be intended not only as a comment on the temperature but also as a request to turn on the heater. How are comprehenders' inferences about a speaker's intentions informed by their ability to reason about the speaker's mental states, that is, "mentalizing?" We…
Descriptors: Language Processing, Guidelines, Correlation, Inferences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Clifton, Charles; Frazier, Lyn – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2020
Domain restriction is a pervasive if often neglected part of discourse comprehension. Speakers and authors implicitly limit the domain of discourse of quantifiers (e.g., "everyone") and noun phrases (e.g., "the girls"). Our previous research shows that an initial temporal or locative prepositional phrase (PP), which introduces…
Descriptors: Language Usage, Nouns, Phrase Structure, Form Classes (Languages)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hanna, Joy E.; Brennan, Susan E.; Savietta, Kelly J. – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2020
During face-to-face communication, people use visual cues about what their partners are attending to as they process language. An eyetracking experiment explored how addressees use speakers' eye gaze and head orientation while interpreting references to objects in a spatial task. Thirty-six naive director/matcher pairs seated face-to-face were…
Descriptors: Eye Movements, Visual Stimuli, Cues, Interpersonal Communication
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6