Descriptor
Collective Bargaining | 4 |
Labor Legislation | 4 |
Teacher Strikes | 3 |
Administrators | 2 |
Negotiation Impasses | 2 |
State Legislation | 2 |
Administrator Role | 1 |
Arbitration | 1 |
Behavior | 1 |
Boards of Education | 1 |
Class Size | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Publication Type
Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Zachary, Peter T. – 1976
Problems have arisen with the Michigan Public Employment Relations Act, which allows collective bargaining for public employees, because the act does not extend the right to strike and has no provision for a final resolution of a bargaining impasse in the event that voluntary settlement is not achieved. Neither voluntary negotiation nor…
Descriptors: Arbitration, Collective Bargaining, Elementary Secondary Education, Labor Legislation
Indiana Univ., Bloomington. Midwest Center for Public Sector Labor Relations. – 1975
In the face of a high degree of legislative activity concerning public sector labor relations in the Midwest, this guide was prepared to familiarize practitioners with such legislation enacted as of May 1, 1975, in Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin. This legislation concerns state employees, fire fighters, municipal…
Descriptors: Administrators, Collective Bargaining, Employer Employee Relationship, Fire Fighters
Rehmus, Charles M.; Wilner, Evan – 1968
A sample of Michigan cities is the basis for an evaluation of the economic benefits of collective bargaining to teachers and the economic impact of bargaining upon the school districts that employ and negotiate with them. The study's conclusions include: (1) Bargaining produced pay increases averaging 10 to 20 percent higher than teachers would…
Descriptors: Class Size, Collective Bargaining, Economic Research, Equalization Aid
CAVE, DAVID RAYMOND – 1967
A STUDY OF 10 SCHOOL DISTRICTS TESTED THE HYPOTHESIS THAT CLASHES BETWEEN SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS AND TEACHERS' UNIONS ARE DUE LARGELY TO THE CONFLICTING PERCEPTIONS OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATOR'S LEADERSHIP BEHAVIOR AS DESCRIBED BY THE ADMINISTRATOR HIMSELF, BY THE SCHOOL BOARD, AND BY MEMBERS OF THE TEACHERS' UNION. ACCORDING TO THE LEADER BEHAVIOR…
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Administrators, Behavior, Boards of Education