Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Cheating | 2 |
| Internet | 2 |
| Test Items | 2 |
| Testing Problems | 2 |
| Access to Information | 1 |
| Certification | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Ethics | 1 |
| High Stakes Tests | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Item Analysis | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Adult Education | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textBengtsson, Lars – Education Sciences, 2019
This work describes a systematic review of the research on take-home exams in tertiary education. It was found that there is some disagreement in the community about the virtues of take-home exams but also a lot of agreement. It is concluded that take-home exams may be the preferred choice of assessment method on the higher taxonomy levels because…
Descriptors: Testing Problems, Cheating, Thinking Skills, Supervision
Giordano, Carolyn; Subhiyah, Raja; Hess, Brian – Online Submission, 2005
There are few certifying or recertifying examinations in the medical field that are given in a take-home format. This stems from a concern that examinees may discuss items with peers, or save copies of items on the exam and then pass them on to others. This study examined if item exposure on take-home examinations influences the difficulty of the…
Descriptors: Computer Software, Test Items, Certification, Licensing Examinations (Professions)
