NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pielstick, N. L.; Thorndike, Robert M. – Psychology in the Schools, 1976
Reanalysis of Wakefield and Carlson's data confirmed canonical correlations of .84 and .69, but analysis of redundancies revealed that only 34 percent of the total WISC subtest variance is redundant with the ITPA and 39 percent of the ITPA subtest variance is redundant with the WISC. (Author)
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Intelligence Tests, Statistical Analysis, Test Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Panton, James H. – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1980
Inmates score significantly lower on the second edition (BETA II) than on the first edition (BETA I), regardless of the order of administration. BETA I score distributions were unaffected by the order of administration. BETA II score distributions depended on whether BETA II was administered first or second. (Author)
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Institutionalized Persons, Intelligence Tests, Prisoners
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mishra, Shitala P. – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1982
Compared the test scores of high and low anxious subjects when the Wechsler Adult Intelligence scale was administered by a trained examiner or mechanically. Findings indicated that performance was influenced by test administration procedures. There was a trend to score higher on the test given by an examiner. (Author/JAC)
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Testing, Examiners, Higher Education
MacKinnon, Ronald C.; Elliott, Charles – 1969
To find the concurrent validity of two scholastic aptitude tests when a scholastic achievement test was used as a criterion for use in placement of mentally retarded children, 127 subjects were involved. The California Achievement Test (CAT) was used as a criterion measure, and the Primary Mental Abilities test (PMA) and the Slosson Intelligence…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Aptitude Tests, Comparative Testing, Correlation